I appreciate your support and completely understand with touching so many things. Let me see what I can do to undo it and then reapply.

I don't use JOSM, only ID and some other pages, so it might be tricky. Will get back to you here.

Each segment was individually examined. They have long been completely overbuilt and replaced by buildings or roadways where there are absolutely no sleepers, rails or other components to suggest there is an "abandoned" or "razed" railway. There is absolutely no trace left on the ground based on clear aerial imagery.

Correction: removed railway since there is no presence on the ground - it has all been removed. Each segment was examined in aerial imagery. With nothing on the ground, it does not meet the definition for "abandoned" or "razed" which means there is at least something left. This should probably be moved to OHM for historical purposes rather than OSM which is only what is presently on the ground.

The railways were completely overbuilt and replaced with buildings and/or parking lots which do not have any rails, sleepers or other items for a railway, thus not meeting the definition of "abanonded" or "razed". The features simply do not exist today (which is what OSM is supposed to map).

Each segment removed has long been built over by buildings and roadways, leaving absolutely no trace. These railways do not exist here. There is no remains (such as sleepers, rails, etc.) that would indicate a railway exists here in order to meet the definition of "abandoned" or "razed".

All rails removed have been fully built over by new roads, parking lots and buildings.

These features do not exist (at least anymore).

If they existed at one point in time, they should be drawn on OHM since they no longer exist and no trace can be found on the ground.

Only railways that have been long replaced by buildings, roads and parking lots were removed. segments obscured by foliage were left.

It seems someone is adding these non-existent railways back to OSM.

Some of it appears to be done by user:zluuzki

These rails go through houses and across roads. It is clear they do not exist. In addition, local survey in several areas confirm that they have been replaced by trails and do not in fact exist as an abandoned or razed railway as there is NO trace of what potentially existed at some point in time.

These features should be moved to OHM instead.

These rails all go through bedrooms and/or roads where there are clearly no rails going across the pavement.

These rails do NOT exist and thus should not be mapped.

Thanks for catching and verifying.

I have gone ahead and cited the source/image and added the name in spanish as well.

Is there a reason why you gave all of the houses a name with their street address?

This edit was manually reverted due to improper tagging and naming of nodes, inconsistent with OSM guidelines.

addressed private land use tags.

Also removed runway based on new satellite imagery, updated taxiways and other building infrastructure and touched up some other features to increase details on the map.

@HubMiner

Looks like this will never be built. Want to go ahead and delete it? Thanks!

Close, but it is a duplicate add. Node and building should be merged, or there should be either a building OR a node, but not both.

Personally, I think building is the better path if it is the only business in the building.

Everything in this edit looks good! Feel free to contribute more in the future!

:D

Reviewing. Looks good, however the "H" in hills, the "G" in golf, and the "C" in Club should all be capitalized.

Also, welcome to OSM! Easiest way to contribute and get involved is by using an app called StreetComplete! Let me know if you have any questions.

Is there a reason you added bridge areas where no bridge exists?