When adding peaks, please ensure you put the altitude into the correct tag, not the name tag. I have corrected this for you in this instance.

Access tags should be used instead (already present). Descriptive names that belong as a tag should not be placed in the name.

It looks like they added a bunch of other questionable features.

What happened to the Sprint store?

Welcome to OSM. It looks like you made some of the common pitfalls when mapping golf courses on OSM. Specifically, golf cartpaths should be tagged as cartpaths, not service roads. Additionally, areas should not partially overlap. I have gone ahead and fixed these. Please review to avoid these mistakes in the future.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

Each parking area should be grouped per lot, not by bunch or group of parking spaces. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking#:~:text=Each%20parking%20area%20feature%20should%20be%20mapped%20as%20a%20contiguous%20area

In addition to the one lot for the parking area, you can map each individual space using the following tag:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

And don't worry, I made the same mistake when I first started. I've gone ahead and merged some of the areas in this region.

Each parking area should be grouped per lot, not by bunch or group of parking spaces. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking#:~:text=Each%20parking%20area%20feature%20should%20be%20mapped%20as%20a%20contiguous%20area

In addition to the one lot for the parking area, you can map each individual space using the following tag:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

And don't worry, I made the same mistake when I first started. I've gone ahead and merged some of the areas in this region.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Do not create "holes" by having the areas loop back on itself. Please review:

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I would recommend reviewing the following:

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

Looks like they have already receieved 2 blocks for this exact thing. And they are still continuing to commit changesets without comments.

osm.org/user_blocks/15086

osm.org/user_blocks/15013
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143186182

Please use more detailed changeset comments. Instead of "." tell us what you changed, and why. thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143187467

I think it varies depending on imagery. some has something that could resemble rails, some imagery does not. Easy enough to add it back, so I added it back.

Following up on the previous changeset comment I left for you on:
osm.org/changeset/143040769

Please use more detailed changeset comments.