'This changeset has been reverted since these "private" paths are visible on aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead. You can read why we won'"'"'t remove them here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/144190738

Not sure what you're talking about, but you do you. Please leave more detailed comments in the future.

'This changeset has been reverted since it exists. Just because it is "private" does not mean it shouldn'"'"'t be mapped. Everything should be mapped, public and private! Access tags should be used instead.

You can read why it won'"'"'t be removed here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'"'"''

osm.org/changeset/144078709

Why the heck did you add an industrial area as a water area?!? This is not correct and as a result, this changeset has been reverted in part or full. Only map what actually exists.

This changeset has been reverted in full. Do not map features incorrectly, especially ones that don't exist.

Do not add features that don't exist just for a silly game. Notably, Arctic Valley Road is already correctly mapped, and to put a false golf service road over it is incorrect.

Additionally, ensure correct tags are used for cartpaths. They are not service roads, but instead paths.

I have resolved this and other mistakes. This changeset was reverted in part or full.

As mentioned previously, Please use more detailed changeset comments to explain what you did. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_change

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143841280

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143884868

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143887577

Please use more detailed changeset comments to explain what you did. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

'This changeset has been reverted since these "private" paths are visible on aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead. You can read why we won'"'"'t remove them here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/143996918

'Regardless of whether it is on private or public property, research indicates that this indeed exists in this location. therefore, this changeset is being reverted to readd the cemetery.

https://www.newshorehamri.gov/DocumentCenter/View/576/Pocock-Cemetery-4-PDF'

osm.org/changeset/143996776

nodes should not be named like this. access tags can be used instead on the road/path.

New road looks good on the map. Thanks for your edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143698750