CurlingMan13's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
166893399 | 2 months ago | But it's there on aerial imagery?
|
166899386 | 2 months ago | Welcome to OSM! Please review: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
166944571 | 2 months ago | Welcome to OSM. reviewed edit.
|
166528263 | 2 months ago | A name is only a name. Don't use descriptions as names. |
161868220 | 2 months ago | I'm glad to see you diving into relations, but quick note regarding the name=* tag.... Don't use ALL CAPS for bus stop names. Please review:
|
153361455 | 2 months ago | Would you be able to conflate all the address nodes into the building import areas? They are duplicates right now and need to be combined. |
155995650 | 2 months ago | When do you expect Eliot Street and East Colorado Street construction to be complete? Or are they already completed? |
137590639 | 2 months ago | Please do not glue landcover to roadways, such as I-90. |
166678169 | 2 months ago | FYI. A good hotkey for ID is [CTRL]+[DOWN ARROW] when you have a way (power line) selected. It will then select all the points instead that make up the way. Then you can tag them as a power pole. Goes a long ways in adding details. :) I am going through your olderC/S in NJ and have been seeing it quite a bit. |
166588641 | 2 months ago | Please update the node that is already there, rather than creating a new seperate node. Most importantly, make sure the old business is removed so you arne't creating confusion. |
166409707 | 3 months ago | That's fine. I will add tags for bollards! |
166409707 | 3 months ago | It is mapped as a service road, which is correct. Access tags were added. |
165941960 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property |
165941765 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property |
165941681 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property |
165941589 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property |
165941510 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property |
166008930 | 3 months ago | Changeset reverted in part or full. We use access tags to denote if something is private. I have added private access tags. |
166362863 | 3 months ago | I would argue that they should not be removed since they are clearly visible on aerial imagery.
|
166354455 | 3 months ago | Welcome to OSM. You can use "Q" to square the buildings and give them proper corners.
|