OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
154110894 4 months ago

Righto, I'll just leave the private property stuff as a note then and leave access as permissive, cheers 👍.

154110894 4 months ago

Yeah, still there, from today https://imgur.com/a/wCA4mW9

I did recall freedom-to-roam though, this means access could just be left as permissive and leave the private sign as note.

154110894 4 months ago

You're right about the fencing, I see the very deliberate gap on the map, but see the street view (https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@56.0238204,-3.4318502,3a,71.2y,141.45h,88.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.913866242945403%26panoid%3DSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg%26yaw%3D141.4549934927017!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQwOC4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDU1SAFQAw%3D%3D) (looked exactly like this when I visited today).

The green sign indicates private property, no trespassing, and there's a small fence gently 'discouraging' pedestrians from continuing to the castle. The one page I could find talking about the castle suggests getting permission from the security first.

Suppose this is a case of 'technically private' vs 'no-one actually cares'.

154110894 4 months ago

Hiya andrum, I see you tagged Rosyth Castle with permissive access, but the sign there indicates the land is Rosyth Ports property, private property, and no trespassing, did you have a particular reason for tagging permissive?

163382687 4 months ago

Yeah, that sounds fair. I'll restore the previous node then.

163382687 5 months ago

Oops, yeah, thanks for letting me know I missed the duplicate. I've modified the parking tags and copied the taxi stand node tags over to a relation combining both areas (like in osm.org/relation/15030337), but I'm not entirely sure how well supported taxi stand relations are 🤔

162940182 5 months ago

That's the interpretation I used, wiki's definition matches. Not sure how much use my re-tagging of farmland is (how often is arable farmland converted to pasture/vice-versa?). In any case, I was mainly focusing on splitting up large farmlands based on fence/wall dividers, tagging meadows was just a fun little side mission :)

162094328 6 months ago

Hey DorneyLake123, can't speak for the other places of worship, but what's the basis for adding building=yes to the Shrine of St. Margaret? As far as I'm aware, the shrine is a marble platform, not a physical building per se.

159064481 9 months ago

Looks like node 4883817270 (Scotland) should not have been moved, I've reverted this node back

153987974 about 1 year ago

Ah, thanks, I'll try to be more careful next time. Figures the first time I'm working with huge objects, something goes wrong 😅

151670540 about 1 year ago

Hi Dnichols14, welcome to OpenStreetMaps 🙂

The path you added in Forres, is this just an informal shortcut across the grass?

And did you delete the driveway in Stubbington by accident, or was there a reason for the removal?

151423890 about 1 year ago

Apologies! I jumped the gun and did not notice that you only in fact swapped the order of tags and removed the white space.

151423890 about 1 year ago

Hi MapSpot,

Why did you remove the parking_space tag? it's unusual, but from survey, this parking space really is designated as disabled only and a charging space.

151156378 about 1 year ago

Thanks Jorisbo

151156378 about 1 year ago

Hi Jorisbo,

Why did you remove the core path designations from these paths? This should still be a core path per (https://www.nature.scot/enjoying-outdoors/routes-explore/local-path-networks)

150800587 about 1 year ago

I'll bare the private parking tagging in mind, thanks.

150800587 about 1 year ago

Thanks, been running low on things to actually add in the local area haha.

149319767 over 1 year ago

It's been made flush now? Nice, I remember how it was raised in the past, and thought it was tagged as flush because of the nearby driveway having a dropped kerb.

I'll change this back shortly.

148406236 over 1 year ago

Ah yes, I was maybe too hasty to change the spelling, if newer sources say so. Older historical sources (OS 25 Inch, 1892-1914) and this OS name book (https://scotlandsplaces.gov.uk/digital-volumes/ordnance-survey-name-books/fife-and-kinross-shire-os-name-books-1853-1855/fife-and-kinross-shire-volume-74/68) from the 19th century use "Clinkhill".

I did also, come across a recent story (https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13097547.Police_find_body_in_missing_jogger_hunt/) where a "Clinthill" is mentioned, so fair, I'll revert my rename, and maybe verify by survey sometime I'm in the area.

146445411 over 1 year ago

Hi JJ5r,

First thing, thanks for contributing, address data is sorely lacking in many places in Scotland.

Second thing, note that a house can only be considered semi-detached if the building has two address units on it. Some of the buildings you've added are actually 3-4 houses together which should be more accurately tagged as "terrace".

Happy mapping,
ExoMal
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146445411