OpenStreetMap 标志 OpenStreetMap

变更集 时间 评论
154110894 4个月前

Righto, I'll just leave the private property stuff as a note then and leave access as permissive, cheers 👍.

154110894 4个月前

Yeah, still there, from today https://imgur.com/a/wCA4mW9

I did recall freedom-to-roam though, this means access could just be left as permissive and leave the private sign as note.

154110894 4个月前

You're right about the fencing, I see the very deliberate gap on the map, but see the street view (https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@56.0238204,-3.4318502,3a,71.2y,141.45h,88.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.913866242945403%26panoid%3DSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg%26yaw%3D141.4549934927017!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQwOC4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDU1SAFQAw%3D%3D) (looked exactly like this when I visited today).

The green sign indicates private property, no trespassing, and there's a small fence gently 'discouraging' pedestrians from continuing to the castle. The one page I could find talking about the castle suggests getting permission from the security first.

Suppose this is a case of 'technically private' vs 'no-one actually cares'.

154110894 4个月前

Hiya andrum, I see you tagged Rosyth Castle with permissive access, but the sign there indicates the land is Rosyth Ports property, private property, and no trespassing, did you have a particular reason for tagging permissive?

163382687 4个月前

Yeah, that sounds fair. I'll restore the previous node then.

163382687 5个月前

Oops, yeah, thanks for letting me know I missed the duplicate. I've modified the parking tags and copied the taxi stand node tags over to a relation combining both areas (like in osm.org/relation/15030337), but I'm not entirely sure how well supported taxi stand relations are 🤔

162940182 5个月前

That's the interpretation I used, wiki's definition matches. Not sure how much use my re-tagging of farmland is (how often is arable farmland converted to pasture/vice-versa?). In any case, I was mainly focusing on splitting up large farmlands based on fence/wall dividers, tagging meadows was just a fun little side mission :)

162094328 6个月前

Hey DorneyLake123, can't speak for the other places of worship, but what's the basis for adding building=yes to the Shrine of St. Margaret? As far as I'm aware, the shrine is a marble platform, not a physical building per se.

159064481 9个月前

Looks like node 4883817270 (Scotland) should not have been moved, I've reverted this node back

153987974 约1年前

Ah, thanks, I'll try to be more careful next time. Figures the first time I'm working with huge objects, something goes wrong 😅

151670540 约1年前

Hi Dnichols14, welcome to OpenStreetMaps 🙂

The path you added in Forres, is this just an informal shortcut across the grass?

And did you delete the driveway in Stubbington by accident, or was there a reason for the removal?

151423890 约1年前

Apologies! I jumped the gun and did not notice that you only in fact swapped the order of tags and removed the white space.

151423890 约1年前

Hi MapSpot,

Why did you remove the parking_space tag? it's unusual, but from survey, this parking space really is designated as disabled only and a charging space.

151156378 约1年前

Thanks Jorisbo

151156378 约1年前

Hi Jorisbo,

Why did you remove the core path designations from these paths? This should still be a core path per (https://www.nature.scot/enjoying-outdoors/routes-explore/local-path-networks)

150800587 约1年前

I'll bare the private parking tagging in mind, thanks.

150800587 约1年前

Thanks, been running low on things to actually add in the local area haha.

149319767 超过1年前

It's been made flush now? Nice, I remember how it was raised in the past, and thought it was tagged as flush because of the nearby driveway having a dropped kerb.

I'll change this back shortly.

148406236 超过1年前

Ah yes, I was maybe too hasty to change the spelling, if newer sources say so. Older historical sources (OS 25 Inch, 1892-1914) and this OS name book (https://scotlandsplaces.gov.uk/digital-volumes/ordnance-survey-name-books/fife-and-kinross-shire-os-name-books-1853-1855/fife-and-kinross-shire-volume-74/68) from the 19th century use "Clinkhill".

I did also, come across a recent story (https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13097547.Police_find_body_in_missing_jogger_hunt/) where a "Clinthill" is mentioned, so fair, I'll revert my rename, and maybe verify by survey sometime I'm in the area.

146445411 超过1年前

Hi JJ5r,

First thing, thanks for contributing, address data is sorely lacking in many places in Scotland.

Second thing, note that a house can only be considered semi-detached if the building has two address units on it. Some of the buildings you've added are actually 3-4 houses together which should be more accurately tagged as "terrace".

Happy mapping,
ExoMal
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146445411