OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83935770 over 5 years ago

HI Shabani,
I Checked it and gave some comments.
See the fix me's ( delete the fixme and round building I used for it.
Have you activated the Validation tool on JOSM?

83961858 over 5 years ago

Hello. I adjusted the tagging and mapping of highways
Best regards and keep mapping
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961858

83961812 over 5 years ago

Hello. See my remarks about highways on other changesets
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961812

83961941 over 5 years ago

Reviewed your mappings. Please read the wiki about how to tag highways. See this page
osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
There is no need to map roads/paths which are good visible from the highway where it connect to.
Residential tag , only to be used in urban areas. Here tag these highways as unclassified. Also check the width of a highway to see if you should tag it as a path or a highway
Best regards
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961941

83961941 over 5 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Never tag a road leading from another highway to buildings as track. Track is reserved for access to farmland , woodland etc.

Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961941

83963831 over 5 years ago

Thanks for mapping here. I reviewed your work and have some comments.
Please connect al paths/highways to each other to get a network. you did not connect nodes of a path to another path. Please keep an eye on that
I corrected it
Best regards and keep mapping
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963831

83963831 over 5 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I reviewed your work and have some remarks.
You mapped paths here. Be sure to connect them to other highways to get a network. There is no need to map paths which leads to areas with no hamlets etc.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963831

83963701 over 5 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. The buildings you mapped are not squared.
Please square each building you map, be accurate in following the outlines when you draw the building by yourself, and square the building with the Q key ( I corrected them)
Best regards
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963701

83963978 over 5 years ago

Hello , Thanks for mapping. You are a new mapper and your work will be reviewed by a validator
The path you mapped is good and accurate.
1 issue. You connected the end of a path to the node of a building. This is an error. Never connect nodes of highways to other features, like buildings and landuse
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963978

84006622 over 5 years ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Because you are a new mapper, validators review your work and give comment and advise.
on this work you did not square much buildings.
Use always the Q key in RapiD to square the buildings. Please be more accurate in mapping the buildings. You mapped also a residential area. It went through 2 buildings. These are errors and should be avoided / repaired. You overlooked the issue triangle on the righthand menu which warned about that issu. Always solve the issues when possible before uploading your work
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84006622

83935770 over 5 years ago

Back again.
You did some validation work didn't you?
Take a look to the mapped highways.
Despite the traces are rather narrow they were tagged as unclassified.
1 highway continuous as a path (other mapper, other decision)
even traces into the field are tagged as unclassified highway. Roads just leading into the field are not supposed to be mapped. when they do not connect to hamlets etc.
And Do you use the Validation tool ?
I did and noticed a number of issues which could be solved by you (in a function as validator )
Let me know if you disagree
Best regards

83935770 over 5 years ago

Hello Shabani
I reviewed this changeset. Good mapped,
Just a remark. In general it is not needed to map every short path when you have a clear view. Here 2 paths mapped. length <100 mtrs
The path coming from the south is to my opinion not worth to be mapped. The building it starts from has a connection to the south to a nearby path. ( not yet mapped.)
best regards

83984238 over 5 years ago

Hello . Back again.
False alarm. Misunderstood the upload,
you squared quite a lot of buildings in bulk i guess. No problem
Just a small issue here.
You squared also round huts which shows now a straight line. Can you correct these?
Best regards

83984238 over 5 years ago

Update.
It seems even worse. 10.000 warnings on this changeset

Before you take action I will ask for advise how to solve this at best
Best regards

83984238 over 5 years ago

Hello SHABANI MAGAWILA,
I think something went terrible wrong with your mapping on this changeset.
I took a look in OSMcha and was curious to know what was happened here.
I opened this changeset in JOSM and ran a validation check.
It gave me a return of nearly 1300 warnings about unconnected nodes without physical tags
So the ways which makes the building and the tag are disappeared
Please take a look by yourself.
I Have no idea what your actions were. but this needs to be solved.
I suggest to revert this changeset to the situation before you started to edit.
If you was working on the same spot since than, it might be wise to revert them as well, otherwise you risk a lot of upload errors
If you need help contact me please.
Here or on Slack (Frans Schutz)

83071480 over 5 years ago

Hello.
You requested to review this changeset.
Well done. Be sure each building has been squared with the Q key.
Best regards

83953923 over 5 years ago

Hello Shabani Magawilla
Thanks for mapping.
You asked for a review.
A question. Can you recall the task number?
This project is supposed to be mapped in RapiD. you mapped in JOSM. With the AI plugin?
The Bing image you used dates from 2010-2014 ( In JOSM right mouse , select Bing and click on Tile info. Metadata Capture date is when the images are taken.
Maxar is more recent and preferable to use (A look on the website of Maxar tells me that the images of this area are taken in august and december 2018)

When you take close look on the image (Maxar) than you will see that the trace of the highway has been changed.
So The highways in the northern part don't exist anymore and can be removed.
Can you do that ?
Best regards

83831230 over 5 years ago

Hello nurpursavani.
I came across your mappings during a survey and have some remarks.
You changed tags of unclassified highways into tag tertiary.
Please reread the wiki about highways and how to tag them
osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Please use the Maxar imagery. Much more recent
best regards

83905093 over 5 years ago

Hello Spencer.
Thanks for mapping here
A remark. You tagged paths here as footway. In these areas the tag path is more common because it can carry all traffic except cars.
Buildings can be identified by the shadow they give. (do not include the shadow in the mapping)
I removed several mappings which you tagged as building which were trees or other objects.
1 object , a courtyard did you map as building as well. No shadow, no building.
No need to map paths which ends in the middle of nowhere.
Best regards and keep mapping

83819147 over 5 years ago

Hello Wiebe. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you are a new mapper.
some remarks on your mappings.
It is common use to tag buildings just as building=yes. Locals will specify which tag should be used incl other details.
Your mappings are not that accurate. Please be more accurate and square each rectangular building with the Q key in iDeditor.
btw. Please use the Maxar Imagery. Instructions has been changed a few days ago
Best regards