OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Mateusz Konieczny's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Mateusz Konieczny

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
4826935 Vacalloria

Unable to answer "What’s the house number of this building?" – Apartment Building – osm.org/way/819258110 via StreetComplete 61.1:

No existe, está en construcción

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/287003.jpg

4826936 Vacalloria

Unable to answer "What’s the house number of this building?" – Apartment Building – osm.org/way/819258110 via StreetComplete 61.1:

O existe, está en construcción

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/287004.jpg

4128458 Mateusz Konieczny

osm.org/node/6374798465

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See osm.wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking

4845409 UserCurt

Moved NE

via StreetComplete_ee 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/289425.jpg

4849468 Mateusz Konieczny

Is osm.org/way/256662490/history still under costruction? Then it should be highway=construction if blocked or have construction=minor tag if pasable. If it is no longer under construction, then construction tag should be removed

4908042 Mateusz Konieczny

osm.org/way/230457488/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.

4762402 Mateusz Konieczny

Wygląda na to że highway=track trzeba tu poprawić.

Bo highway=track to droga na pole/do lasu która nie prowadzi do domów

Jakość drogi oznaczamy przez surface, smoothness - jeśli jest droga do domów to będzie to highway=residential/service a nie highway=track, nawet jeśli jest to droga nieutwardzona

4911484 Mateusz Konieczny

osm.org/way/226825821/history has surface = Turf

What is this? surface=artificial_turf or surface=grass? See osm.wiki/Tag:surface%3Dturf

4911479 Mateusz Konieczny

osm.org/way/718301703/history has maxspeed:source = PL:urban

Czy maxspeed:source jest użyte celowo zamiast source:maxspeed ? Zobacz osm.wiki/Key:source:maxspeed

maxspeed:type jest też czasem używane, patrz osm.wiki/Key:maxspeed:type

4817916

Na mapach satelitarnych google, na mapach lotniczych mapy.cz, widać że tu przechodzi pięć torów a nie cztery, potwierdza to też plan stacji Oświęcim z zaznaczonymi torami odstawczymi nr. 10,12,14,16,18. żaden plan stacji nie wspomina też o "tunelach" w planie torów odstawczych.