OpenStreetMap
Mingwei's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 142840402 | 7 months ago | Looks good! |
| 133599949 | 9 months ago | nice |
| 153507873 | about 1 year ago | nice thank you |
| 151294394 | about 1 year ago | Nice! |
| 151209841 | about 1 year ago | 🎉 |
| 151429676 | about 1 year ago | Thanks SomeoneElse! |
| 151388676 | about 1 year ago | Seems good |
| 145306791 | over 1 year ago | Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: osm.wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes` |
| 145781131 | over 1 year ago | nice |
| 143933300 | over 1 year ago | Nice! |
| 143333684 | almost 2 years ago | Nice |
| 139806457 | almost 2 years ago | These bikeways should be marked as cycleway=track since they are physically separated from the general travel lanes. Considered Class IV bikeways. Fixed in osm.org/changeset/140036210 |
| 138475752 | about 2 years ago | definitely should be sidewalk=separate |
| 137939793 | about 2 years ago | Thank you! |
| 137625273 | about 2 years ago | missed a spot osm.org/way/8922462 |
| 136918820 | about 2 years ago | Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong |
| 136986542 | about 2 years ago | Please stop randomly changing road classes, and please give your edits meaningful descriptions
|
| 127026864 | about 2 years ago | Heads up the mixing zone turn lanes, e.g. at Oak onto Scott, are cycleway:right=shared_lane, with sharrows cycleway:right:lane=pictogram |
| 131626484 | over 2 years ago | Nice work |
| 133887731 | over 2 years ago | https://news.yahoo.com/oakland-puts-barriers-combat-sex-141915425.html |
