OpenStreetMap
Mingwei 的评论
| 变更集 | 时间 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|
| 142840402 | 7个月前 | Looks good! |
| 133599949 | 9个月前 | nice |
| 153507873 | 约1年前 | nice thank you |
| 151294394 | 约1年前 | Nice! |
| 151209841 | 约1年前 | 🎉 |
| 151429676 | 约1年前 | Thanks SomeoneElse! |
| 151388676 | 约1年前 | Seems good |
| 145306791 | 超过1年前 | Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: osm.wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes` |
| 145781131 | 超过1年前 | nice |
| 143933300 | 超过1年前 | Nice! |
| 143333684 | 近2年前 | Nice |
| 139806457 | 近2年前 | These bikeways should be marked as cycleway=track since they are physically separated from the general travel lanes. Considered Class IV bikeways. Fixed in osm.org/changeset/140036210 |
| 138475752 | 约2年前 | definitely should be sidewalk=separate |
| 137939793 | 约2年前 | Thank you! |
| 137625273 | 约2年前 | missed a spot osm.org/way/8922462 |
| 136918820 | 约2年前 | Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong |
| 136986542 | 约2年前 | Please stop randomly changing road classes, and please give your edits meaningful descriptions
|
| 127026864 | 约2年前 | Heads up the mixing zone turn lanes, e.g. at Oak onto Scott, are cycleway:right=shared_lane, with sharrows cycleway:right:lane=pictogram |
| 131626484 | 超过2年前 | Nice work |
| 133887731 | 超过2年前 | https://news.yahoo.com/oakland-puts-barriers-combat-sex-141915425.html |
