OpenStreetMap
Mingwei's Comments
| Changeset | Quand | Comentari |
|---|---|---|
| 142840402 | fa près de 7 de mes | Looks good! |
| 133599949 | fa près de 9 de mes | nice |
| 153507873 | fa près de 1 an | nice thank you |
| 151294394 | fa près de 1 an | Nice! |
| 151209841 | fa près de 1 an | 🎉 |
| 151429676 | fa près de 1 an | Thanks SomeoneElse! |
| 151388676 | fa près de 1 an | Seems good |
| 145306791 | fa près de 1 an | Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: osm.wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes` |
| 145781131 | fa près de 1 an | nice |
| 143933300 | fa près de 1 an | Nice! |
| 143333684 | fa près de 2 d'oras | Nice |
| 139806457 | fa près de 2 d'oras | These bikeways should be marked as cycleway=track since they are physically separated from the general travel lanes. Considered Class IV bikeways. Fixed in osm.org/changeset/140036210 |
| 138475752 | fa près de 2 d'ans | definitely should be sidewalk=separate |
| 137939793 | fa près de 2 d'ans | Thank you! |
| 137625273 | fa près de 2 d'ans | missed a spot osm.org/way/8922462 |
| 136918820 | fa près de 2 d'ans | Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong |
| 136986542 | fa près de 2 d'ans | Please stop randomly changing road classes, and please give your edits meaningful descriptions
|
| 127026864 | fa près de 2 d'ans | Heads up the mixing zone turn lanes, e.g. at Oak onto Scott, are cycleway:right=shared_lane, with sharrows cycleway:right:lane=pictogram |
| 131626484 | fa près de 2 d'ans | Nice work |
| 133887731 | fa près de 2 d'ans | https://news.yahoo.com/oakland-puts-barriers-combat-sex-141915425.html |
