OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
111484120 almost 4 years ago

I think 快乐的老鼠宝宝 done in osm.org/changeset/111485466 is fix to your damage because addition in fixme and deletion in name:en truly make damage to data, this should not be done as a maintainer.

Besides, how long will your investigation finished?

If your "investigation" never ends, does that mean freezing this area forever?

PLEASE RESPONSE TO THOSE QUESTION BEFORE LAST TIME YOU DO,DEAR DWG MEMBER,EDVAC SIR!

111484120 almost 4 years ago

How DWG solve this?

Just by giving a sentence again and again:"
This area, together with the Doklam plateau, are under investigation by the DWG."

111484120 almost 4 years ago

So the result???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

111439332 almost 4 years ago

So what's the results of it? Or how much have the investigation taken?

110735874 almost 4 years ago

这些名字来自于一些微博的军事博主,并且也依照附近地名来命名;但是由于内容发布时间较早,具体的那条微博我现在找不到了,请谅解。

110858577 almost 4 years ago

问阁下,既然在该区域在接受调查,那么您为什么要先做出更改?
Why did you make the change first when this area is under investigation?

110486490 almost 4 years ago

尊敬的孟阁下,您好:

您在变更集#109657388中变更了金门边界,并且没有给出相应的依据或变更理由,亦造成了关系上的错误,在下回退了阁下的变更集,并在变更集内解释了原因,阁下现继续做出此编辑,且在变更集注释中没有给出有效的信息,希望可以给出做出此变更的原因或根据,谢谢,祝编安。

NM$L,重庆

110044665 almost 4 years ago

==Copy from 94546363==
devac您好,
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则,一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅?
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了,我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况,其余我无可奉告。
并且,数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界,不加以警告或提醒,干啥啥不行,双标第一名,我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪,请见谅,我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

110455803 almost 4 years ago

怎么到处都有嘉心糖(喜

110455803 almost 4 years ago

😅

94546363 almost 4 years ago

devac您好,
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则,一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅?
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了,我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况,其余我无可奉告。
并且,数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界,不加以警告或提醒,干啥啥不行,双标第一名,我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪,请见谅,我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

109795451 almost 4 years ago

来源
https://dmfw.mca.gov.cn/online/map.html?keyWordPlaceName=&isIndex=true

103511289 over 4 years ago

Dear Woodpeck, I've made my point clear and asked you if you would change other disputed area such as Aksai Chin. You didn't give me a direct answer but I could feel your attitude from your reply. So I just did it. And I think there're still some disputed areas not being changed to meet your standard. All in all, not change them, or change them all. Thank you for your understanding.

99024725 over 4 years ago

I think the India-Pakistan cease fire line doesn't completely depart this area and it should be a disputed area.

99999999 over 4 years ago

哈哈,可惜差了一点啊😂

100000000 over 4 years ago

Congratulations from China!

99400987 over 4 years ago

😅😅😅

97218565 over 4 years ago

恭祝公路贯通

95464155 over 4 years ago

Why you named all the boundary "India"?

93800926 over 4 years ago

建议玩CSL