Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Gruppo de modificationes Quando Commento
67326681 plus de 6 annos retro

I've mistakenly edited a Jim Beam facility near Cincinnati.

67240413 plus de 6 annos retro

Hi A67-A67,

roller coasters are not railways. I understand the problem of a missing official tag. But misusing a tag for a very different feature (railways) is much more 'made-up' than using a correct tag: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roller_coaster=track

Kind regards

63894644 quasi 7 annos retro

Ok, I understand.

63902749 quasi 7 annos retro

Dear PierZen,

it's not acceptable to revert improvements ( osm.org/changeset/62344402 ) just to ensure that the history of some ways is kept. osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history is nice to have, but not more important than any other rules.

63765861 quasi 7 annos retro

This seems to be a more invasive change. May you please document at some place (e.g. Wiki) why this was necessary?

62643604 quasi 7 annos retro

Dear Metroh,

how have you identified railway crossings like osm.org/node/5910245765 which don't lie on any railway line?

60076258 quasi 7 annos retro

Rückgängig gemacht in osm.org/changeset/63867551 – Man kann nicht sagen, dass man das Tagging aufräumt und dann bei mehren Anschlussgleisen das service=spur vergessen. Vorher war's weniger falsch!

62187465 quasi 7 annos retro

Hi peace2,

when there is no inner polygon you don't need a multipolygon relation.

Regards

62598739 quasi 7 annos retro

M!dgard stated publicly "i removed an undocumented, fairly low-usage, nonsensical tag to avoid it showing up in iD" -> that's not a valid reason to remove something by a mechanical edit, so I've reverted this in osm.org/changeset/62612995

BTW there have been more than 700 occurrences by several users.

62436455 quasi 7 annos retro

Demolished buildings

62435507 quasi 7 annos retro

Hej. Det visste jag inte.

59440306 circa 7 annos retro

@NKA: By which changeset? I've wanted to replace this bogus import, which has mainly wrong geometries (see the forests), with new data. You've simply been too fast in reverting.

61162206 circa 7 annos retro

I've checked this in detail: The account has only removed very small PGS fragments, which are irretrievably broken. They are no benefit for remapping.

59753906 circa 7 annos retro

Do you know this tag osm.wiki/Tag:irrigation%3Dpivot ?

53074097 circa 7 annos retro

@nikasth: You've mapped several wind turbines as duplicates directly beneath pre-existing wind mills. Example:

osm.org/node/1824857437 - osm.org/node/5176647130 (your dupe)

58942150 plus de 7 annos retro

What are you changing when you just write a "."?

35909815 plus de 7 annos retro

Please read this and act!

58613984 plus de 7 annos retro

Ok, I'm sorry. Actually I've changed my mapping habits because of complaints by some German users.
Before I've mapped the same way like you. These forest pieces are clearly planted and not native forests.

Thanks for your advice!

58621172 plus de 7 annos retro

I'm now using the "Download along" tool from JOSM to delete this ways again, but this is huge data and JOSM is just eating up all my memory. Please give me a little bit more time.

52718816 plus de 7 annos retro

Hi Nick,

I doubt, that there are any 500 kV lines in Puerto Rico. I've just falsely accusated someone else (osm.org/changeset/52834243), which told me you as source of this.

Greetings