OpenStreetMap
Nehaj's Comments
| Changeset | Bila | Komen |
|---|---|---|
| 67326681 | lebih 6 tahun yang lalu | I've mistakenly edited a Jim Beam facility near Cincinnati. |
| 67240413 | lebih 6 tahun yang lalu | Hi A67-A67, roller coasters are not railways. I understand the problem of a missing official tag. But misusing a tag for a very different feature (railways) is much more 'made-up' than using a correct tag: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roller_coaster=track Kind regards |
| 63894644 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Ok, I understand. |
| 63902749 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Dear PierZen, it's not acceptable to revert improvements ( osm.org/changeset/62344402 ) just to ensure that the history of some ways is kept. osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history is nice to have, but not more important than any other rules. |
| 63765861 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | This seems to be a more invasive change. May you please document at some place (e.g. Wiki) why this was necessary? |
| 62643604 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Dear Metroh, how have you identified railway crossings like osm.org/node/5910245765 which don't lie on any railway line? |
| 60076258 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Rückgängig gemacht in osm.org/changeset/63867551 – Man kann nicht sagen, dass man das Tagging aufräumt und dann bei mehren Anschlussgleisen das service=spur vergessen. Vorher war's weniger falsch! |
| 62187465 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Hi peace2, when there is no inner polygon you don't need a multipolygon relation. Regards |
| 62598739 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | M!dgard stated publicly "i removed an undocumented, fairly low-usage, nonsensical tag to avoid it showing up in iD" -> that's not a valid reason to remove something by a mechanical edit, so I've reverted this in osm.org/changeset/62612995 BTW there have been more than 700 occurrences by several users. |
| 62436455 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Demolished buildings |
| 62435507 | hampir 7 tahun yang lalu | Hej. Det visste jag inte. |
| 59440306 | sekitar 7 tahun yang lalu | @NKA: By which changeset? I've wanted to replace this bogus import, which has mainly wrong geometries (see the forests), with new data. You've simply been too fast in reverting. |
| 61162206 | sekitar 7 tahun yang lalu | I've checked this in detail: The account has only removed very small PGS fragments, which are irretrievably broken. They are no benefit for remapping. |
| 59753906 | sekitar 7 tahun yang lalu | Do you know this tag osm.wiki/Tag:irrigation%3Dpivot ? |
| 53074097 | sekitar 7 tahun yang lalu | @nikasth: You've mapped several wind turbines as duplicates directly beneath pre-existing wind mills. Example: osm.org/node/1824857437 - osm.org/node/5176647130 (your dupe) |
| 58942150 | lebih 7 tahun yang lalu | What are you changing when you just write a "."? |
| 35909815 | lebih 7 tahun yang lalu | Please read this and act! |
| 58613984 | lebih 7 tahun yang lalu | Ok, I'm sorry. Actually I've changed my mapping habits because of complaints by some German users.
Thanks for your advice! |
| 58621172 | lebih 7 tahun yang lalu | I'm now using the "Download along" tool from JOSM to delete this ways again, but this is huge data and JOSM is just eating up all my memory. Please give me a little bit more time. |
| 52718816 | lebih 7 tahun yang lalu | Hi Nick, I doubt, that there are any 500 kV lines in Puerto Rico. I've just falsely accusated someone else (osm.org/changeset/52834243), which told me you as source of this. Greetings |