OpenStreetMap-logo OpenStreetMap

E-mail-ikon Bluesky-ikon Facebook-ikon LinkedIn-ikon Mastodon-ikon Telegram-ikon X-ikon

Diskussion

Kommentar fra Jean-Marc Liotier skrevet 15. december 2009 kl. 17:43

If they are an exact carbon copy of reality and feature a credible source, then it is acceptable... But indeed if reality diverges and no source is cited, this hints at malpractice. If you have any question, your best option is to just ask the author privately.

Kommentar fra PhilippeP skrevet 15. december 2009 kl. 18:36

Well, data in OSM is based on French cadastre ... Google might have the same source ... but both seems to have the very same nodes ... seems odd ...

Kommentar fra PhilippeP skrevet 18. december 2009 kl. 10:13

Strange , I'll check again from home ...

Kommentar fra wieland skrevet 18. december 2009 kl. 18:05

And how do you know about the nodes?
Normally GM shows only pics and no data.
But you can trick them by using routing.

Kommentar fra PhilippeP skrevet 18. december 2009 kl. 19:12

Well there is a node where there is a break in an almost straight line ...

But I think I confused myself with the mapsurfer hack that replacs streetmap in GM with OSM , it seems it now also replaces the data on top of the aerial pictures seamlessly ...it tricked myself ...

I'm feeling Goofy now :)

Case closed : it WAS OSM data :)

Log ind for at kommentere