Hi,
The Millennia Walk eatery wing is missing, and the mall is floating in the air since your indoor mapping changes. FYI.

https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=1.29248&lon=103.85971&zoom=17.2&tilt=30&rotation=21

Hi,
Your series of changes destroyed the 3D building parts which was put in only recently. Will appreciate if you can revert your changes, and add indoor building parts without deleting or modifying the existing ways.
https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=1.29341&lon=103.85978&zoom=17.2&tilt=45&rotation=19

Hi,
Why was the residential area removed?
https://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/where2shop/explore/central-area/cheng-yan-court

Hi,
This change happens to break 3D building part for Pan Pacific Hotel.

FYI.
https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=1.29230&lon=103.85864&zoom=17

Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (Millenia Walk) without any inner polygons?

Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (City Square Residences) without any inner polygons?

Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (Old Police Academy) without any inner polygons?

Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple park (Gardens by the Bay) without any inner polygons?

Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple park (Gardens by the Bay East) without any inner polygons?

Hi,
This change introduced a fictitious mono-rail between Changi Airport terminals 2 and 4. Are you able to verify if this indeed exists?

Hi,

Ikea Alexandra seems to be broken by this edit. Are you able to fix this?

Issue with the issues being in water should be resolved after coastline updates, as these landmass will become solid ground surrounded by water.

This changeset introduces several ways which does not show in the imagery. Are you able to verify if these service roads indeed exists?

Hi,

Noticed that almost all your changes are to introduce meadows, and that almost the whole of Yishun is covered in meadows.

Are you able to correctly map the small grass patches instead of covering the whole estate in grass? In case you are not aware, OSM is not purely meant for games.

The guide for APM is typically a concrete column and I will be hard-pressed to say that it is a 'rail'. Even on Wikipedia, there is also a clear distinction between monorail (Sentosa Express) and APM-systems.

I would advise to properly edit the OSM wiki and introduce the new route type instead of mixing up these transport systems and thus generating more bad data due to incorrect wiki suggestions.

My concern with introducing new partial route relations is the following...
1) Why is there a need to maintain multiple relations just because the line is not yet open/under construction?
2) Who will maintain these routes relations and merge them once the line opens? Isn't it simplier to just update the role instead of having to edit the existing route relation and delete the 'temporarily' relation?
3) Is there any uses that cannot be satisfied by using the documented role=stop nodes already in the relation, and ignoring the unknown/new role=stop_inactive nodes? There is nothing odd about having planned/under construction parts of the line in the route.

Also note that OSM neither restrict users from inventing new tags, nor state that route relation shall be made-up of active-members only.

If this change is to simply satisfy the PT route validators, I am sorry to inform you validators are a low-priority and PTv2 is not a good proposal anyway due to the un-necessary complexity. I would priortise having the most accurate routes (both in-use and planned/under construction), and most importantly have the route easily maintained in the event of changes in the route due to new station opening.
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Refined_Public_Transport

Hi,
Please try to use a different relation role instead of entirely removing the relation node from the route relations.

Hi,
Please try to use a different relation role instead of entirely removing the relation node from the route relations.

It will be better to correctly classify it as route=apm instead of route=monorail.

Hi,
Monorail may be classified as APM, but not the other way round.