Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'Ocean Towers'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2837019&lon=103.8604464&zoom=18&camera.theta=51.925&camera.phi=-138.942

Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'Marina Bay Sands'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2837019&lon=103.8604464&zoom=18&camera.theta=51.925&camera.phi=-138.942

Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'Marine Bay Sands'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2929702&lon=103.8505379&zoom=19&camera.theta=48.487&camera.phi=17.475

Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'Peninsula Plaza'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2917398&lon=103.8494330&zoom=19&camera.theta=57.368&camera.phi=19.481

Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'The Treasury'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2900334&lon=103.8463338&zoom=18&camera.theta=52.785&camera.phi=10.6

Hi,
Your incorrect addition of building height has broke the rendering of 'Central'.

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2877972&lon=103.8431987&zoom=18&camera.theta=52.785&camera.phi=10.6

Hi,
Your incorrect addition of building heights has broke the 3D render of 'People's Park Centre'.

Hi,
I think all OSM renderers do not show building footprints tagged as building:part. So this breaks both map renders and searches. Thus, I would still recommend any buildings with unique addresses remain tagged as buildings instead of building:part.

I think this has been discussed previously with ADT too.
osm.org/changeset/66204783

Seems like there has been a recent change in Nominatim, where building:part has been made searchable. However, I would prefer that buildings with unique addresses remains as buildings instead of building:part.

Nevertheless, this change is still impacting other downstream usages of address search and rendering whereby the (1) address number is no longer rendered and (2) other apps that only indexes buildings and not building:parts will break searches.

Hi,

Your recent changes have broken the 3D renderings, such as Pan Pacific, The Float, Saint Andrew’s cathedral.

https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=1.29246&lon=103.85950&zoom=16.6&tilt=29&rotation=19 https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2924762&lon=103.8585509&zoom=18&camera.theta=61.092&camera.phi=-2.865

The recent changes have made those building addresses non-searchable in Nominatim.

The problem is that even commercial areas have the service=driveway and service=parking_aisle removed.
https://openstreetcam.org/details/2122538/885/track-info

This happens all around regions where I have carefully tagged the relevant service ways with the correct categorisation, only to see it removed.
osm.org/way/171053115#map=19/1.54533/103.71283&layers=D

I don't care which stupid Wiki are you referring to, but my definition of driveway comes from US law which has a proper definition, unlike the Wiki which comes from a dictionary and is not even defined in UK law.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC&sectionNum=5870.&article=1.&highlight=true&keyword=driveway

Most importantly, your team should not remove data unless you are sure that it is not something verifiable on-the-ground. Please take your tagging wars elsewhere, and stick to what people have already tagged.

Hi,
I would like the ADT team to immediately stop touching all relevant service road edits, which have removed various service=driveway and service=parking_aisle tags. I don't agree with the Wiki tagging conventions, and I certainly do not like tagging conventions from other regions forced down my throat.