Commentos de RobJN
Gruppo de modificationes | Quando | Commento |
---|---|---|
163655840 | 4 menses retro | man_made=charge_point : "A device for charging electric vehicles". This is exactly what these are. They are also part of a charging station : "A location where an electric vehicle may be charged" even if you are not happy to use the amenity tag. The key words here are device and location. |
163655840 | 4 menses retro | Why not use man_made=charge_point: osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point |
163655840 | 4 menses retro | Я не думаю, что так работает тег amenity. Добавление к нему access=no и bus=yes — это нормально. I don't think that is how the amenity tag works. Adding access=no and bus=yes on to it is fine. |
156250928 | 5 menses retro | Hi Kevin. I am looking at doing some EV charge point mapping in the UK. Can you please let me know where you sourced the ref:ocpi values from so that I can do a bit more research to properly understand this tag. Many thanks
|
140236779 | quasi 2 annos retro | Just to be clear, your edits were not vandilism. The vandilism came from the user (corrector321) who deleted my previous mapping of this garden. That editor is working for the owner of this garden and hence I checked with the Data Working Group that I was ok to restore my edits. Obviously you had no way to know all this so I was not overly surprised to see your edits. This then left me with a conundrum - leave it as you had mapped or roll all the way back to my edits. I chose to go with the latter. I hope that was ok. |
140236779 | quasi 2 annos retro | Hi SteveWM. Just to let you know that I have reverted these edits. I had previously mapped this garden in detail but the data was deleted. I raised this with the Data Working Group last week and they agreed that I could restore it. In the meantime you made these edits. I have now rolled it all the way back to the state it was a couple months ago. |
52424140 | plus de 2 annos retro | No because I have no intent to go back there anytime soon. Try looking at https://www.google.com/search?q=hardcore+surface "generally broken down bits of concrete, stones and bricks – which do not deteriorate or absorb water. It is the creation of construction waste" Without going back I have no idea how compacted it was; likely a little but not much leaving a rough surface. |
120635452 | quasi 3 annos retro | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits around Hampton Magna. A small word of caution: Please be careful when using the iD editor as it often proposes "fixes" that are wrong. For example it has a tendency to add "bridges" over streams when the reality is not a bridge but the stream running through a culvert instead. I have reviewed the edits you made and made adjustments to correct these instances. Rob (in Warwick) |
116385463 | plus de 3 annos retro | Hi Peter. I noticed that you are using the addr:locality tag in some addressees you map. I thought I'd message to point you in the direction of the discussion on the talk-gb mailing list that's been occurring over the last month. In short we've been looking at the tags used and some have suggested not to use addr:locality. I've tried to capture the discussion on the wiki: osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom I hope this helps. Best wishes and happy mapping
|
116275135 | plus de 3 annos retro | Hi Welshie. I spotted that you were using the addr:locality tag so wondered if you had picked up the discussion on talk-gb mailing list about address tags? In short: some members have suggested that we avoid this tag. I've tried to capture as much detail as possible over at osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom Hope this helps. Best wishes
|
116562669 | plus de 3 annos retro | I think that was a topic that split opinions. Some want to use Postal Towns (likely as it is a standard they are used to) while others don't see the need to align to RM. I didn't want to wade in to that one with this edit so I focussed on correcting a known issue (addr:place misused). As a local mapper you seem better placed to decide on a addr:city tag :-) |
116562669 | plus de 3 annos retro | Because the Postal Town has been recorded in addr:city, and addr:suburb is the next level. It's a hierarchy and the words "city" and "suburb" can be ignored. For more info see osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom |
116457516 | plus de 3 annos retro | Just for completeness, it is worth noting here that there are other emails on the talk-gb mailing list that essentially disagree with this edit and point out that the "suburb" in addr:suburb should not be interpreted to literally mean "suburb". Instead the addr:suburb tag should be used for any settlement that appears on the address above the postal town. Furthermore addr:suburb is a globally accepted tag which is documented. This is not the case for addr:village. Just adding this here as the sole link to a single mailing list post might appear as if this edit is uncontested. |
105235600 | circa 4 annos retro | That's a shame that these businesses are now longer there. Has anything replaced them? P.S. Is the Natwest ATM still there? If not, that can be removed from the map too. Thanks,
|
104845255 | circa 4 annos retro | This edit looks good to me. Please note however that you are not allowed to copy from Ordnance Survey maps as they are subject to copyright. I'm leaving this edit in as you have also put "local knowledge" as a source, but if that is not the case then the edit should be removed. Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. If you want any further help, please feel free to message me. Best wishes,
|
104377735 | circa 4 annos retro | "Looks like battery storage" is wishful thinking. I am pretty sure that this is a diesel site sandwiched between the solar panels :-( I have updated it accordingly. |
103997958 | circa 4 annos retro | Thanks Jerry. You beat me to it. I was going to add this once I'd got to a few more cases mapped. I'll add to the page over the next week. Best regards
|
79194612 | plus de 4 annos retro | I'm not a big wikidata expert either. I think I was just using a dedicated editor to add some wikidata tags (https://osm.wikidata.link/). Looking at the wikidata page though (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42892204?uselang=en) it appears that the item relates to the library rather than the building. In that case I suggest adding the wikidata value to the new location. You could update the wikidata page as well if you like. P.S. The wikidata expert I turn to when I have questions is Andy Mabbett : osm.org/user/pigsonthewing |
94941491 | plus de 4 annos retro | Hi RedHawk13. Thank you for adding these to OpenStreetMap. I used to live in Coventry but moved out a few years ago and was aware that lots was changing in the city centre. So pleased to see that you are helping to keep the map up to date :-) P.S. Do you know if the new Western Link Road between Central Six and the Inner Ring Road has now opened? |
87509372 | quasi 5 annos retro | I've made some further improvements to the map of Westwood Student Mews. Are you able to check it please and make further adjustments if needed. |