Hello!

This changeset is problematic. It several buildings on top of existing ones. For instance, osm.org/way/1305386992 is located in the same place where building osm.org/relation/8889531 already present.

Another one osm.org/way/1305387001 even should not be a building! There is water body there osm.org/way/640937775

It seems that this changeset was produced by some kind of automation. Please do not upload other changes from the same tool without manual verification.

Olá!

Was any reason why osm.org/way/1307028817/history was access=no? Looks like accidental mistake.

👋 Welcome to OpenStreetMap contributors!

This was your first edit and you made some accidentally made some unintended changes. Particularly I would like to point out:
- changing landuse of osm.org/way/448744867 from farmland to leisure park. Indeed farmland was not a correct type, but park in my opinion is even more incorrect. This should be landuse=allotments (see osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments )
- You set name of construction area osm.org/way/1267795895 to "Parque Urbano de Requesende". That is also incorrect for this area: they do not build park, they build apartments building.

Though you are right that this area is quite poorly represented and needs work. I am going to improve it soon. Would you like to review my edits when they are done and comment them based on your local knowledge?

Hi!

This changeset merges two sections of allotments that are actually separated. So I splitted them back and made a multipolygon: osm.org/relation/19100199

Also I am not sure that "Horta de Paranhos" is the name of this horta. Horta de Paranhos seems to be in another place as per this article https://ambiente.cm-porto.pt/hortas/horta-de-paranhos

Olá! Bem-vindo aos contribuidores do OpenStreetMap!

Notei que esta é uma das suas primeiras alterações, e foi feita de uma forma bastante incomum. Foram removidas informações úteis como:

landuse=orchard

leaf_cycle=deciduous

leaf_type=broadleaved

trees=kiwi_plants

e adicionados muitos caminhos com um estilo pouco convencional.

Poderia, por favor, descrever a motivação para esta alteração? Tem alguma fonte que confirme que este terreno já não é utilizado como pomar? E qual é o objetivo de adicionar tantos caminhos?

Obrigado pela sua colaboração!

=========

Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap contributors!

This is one of your first changes, and it has been made in a highly unusual style. It removes useful information:

landuse=orchard

leaf_cycle=deciduous

leaf_type=broadleaved

trees=kiwi_plants

and adds lots of paths in an unconventional style.

Could you describe the motivation for this change? Do you have sources confirming that this land is no longer used as an orchard? Also, what is the purpose of tagging so many paths?

👋

Why have you added name "Passadiço" to the way here?

I think it goes against good practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer (see scetions "Don't map for the render" and "Don't use name tag to describe things"). Basically this way boils down to
bridge=boardwalk , probably surface=wood for extra details, but "Passadiço" is not a name.

I am going to delete these names from adjacent walkways

Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In this changeset you you have added name=Kiosk for two nodes:

osm.org/node/12281564755
osm.org/node/6886954185

This is not correct. Most likely you should have used tag shop=kiosk.

Please check osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Imported node osm.org/node/9537692779 duplicates already existing statue osm.org/node/2518620995

I am going to merge them.

Ah sorry.

Though I was there a couple of days ago and have not noticed replica near the dovecot building. Probably they moved it?

Also it is really looks like this is an accidentally duplicated node.

If you are sure that is indeed another replica, adding note=* or description=* tag with human readable explanation of what it is and why it is distinct might help.

I suppose this change added node osm.org/node/10941887433 by mistake. Which duplicates osm.org/node/3906378865 and is placed in the wrong location

Well, I t does not look like parking either, so I just delete the way under question

Hello

Way you have changed osm.org/way/474655380 to the military=nuclear_explosion_site in this changeset? This looks like a error to me, I revert this.

Hi. You have created a duplicate in your changeset.

You created osm.org/node/11171561337 but it was already present in OSM as osm.org/node/3739018875

I delete you node.

Hello! What is the logic of changing this way osm.org/way/370626233 from bridge to the embankment in this changeset? Embankment does not look appropriate: osm.wiki/Key:embankment

Hello. I delete this way named "Largo da Feira"

osm.org/way/303755462

It does not seem that it actually corresponds to something in reality and it suspiciously overlaps with sports area

Здравствуйте

А зачем вы добавили в этом пакете правок Optics.am притом дважды? Ваши новые точки: osm.org/node/11039320305 и osm.org/node/11039320405

Но ведь магазин уже был обозначен: osm.org/node/10641781073 Если нужно было уточнить что-то про него, то нужно было редактировать существующую точку.

Hi!

Why have you marked osm.org/node/10075026769 as historic=memorial here? Look more like an artwork for me

Здравствуйте.

А что собственно вы исправили в этой правке? Кажется ничего не изменилось

Здравствуйте

Может не ставить к чейнджсетам комментарий "дополнение"?

Смысла в нём получается никакого, он никак не помогает отличить одни правки от других в истории osm.org/user/Artachok/history никак не помогает, над чем шла работа в пакете правок.

Hello. Why have you kept names on the bridge in this changeset? The name seems to be an error from someone who does not know about bridge:structure=simple-suspension

I am going to delete names