OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83578837 over 5 years ago

Could you better be more specific with the sources for your next edits if possible? For this edit, one good source is the JICA 2012 study for the CALAEx Laguna section (though the actual interchange to be built can vary due to space constraints and construction costs).

82719698 over 5 years ago

I hope you stick upon that promise again!

79255892 over 5 years ago

No need to say that, but why would you move Route 55 into Ninoy Aquino Boulevard?

79538639 over 5 years ago

Again, where do you get that 30 kph speed limit for Maharlika Highway through Pili? If there are signs, fine, otherwise, assume 40 (per RA 4136).

82951115 over 5 years ago

I'm noticing you have been mapping names of people in the last days. It is okay to map outlines of houses, but not the name of the owner. For OpenStreetMap's policy on this matter, please read osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information .

The Philippines OpenStreetMap community has been monitoring this matter, see https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/58.

If you have questions or comments, please let me know here or by private message (go to my user profile and click "send message")

79255892 over 5 years ago

I don't know where did you get that Romulo Highway (Route 55, or PH-55 in the way you say it) is moved to Ninoy Aquino Avenue in this edit. The DPWH still assigns that route to Romulo Boulevard, so I reverted it.

83006246 over 5 years ago

Sorry for this (have lost track of my editing activity), but I forgot to save the edits for Talugtug before doing those for Taal.

79275137 over 5 years ago

I would agree only with 30-60 kph if there are signs or so, otherwise, the RA 4136 defaults apply. Some highway segments through towns are signed 30 kph as I remember on a 2015 trip to Ilocos, but if you cannot prove them, I'll be retagging them to reflect the legal default than the "safe", "comfortable", or "practical" speed as you think. Provide me also your observations on your trip if I must keep the 30/60 kph values or retag to follow the national defaults.

So far as national speed limits are concerned, RA 4136 hasn't been amended (though I can remember in the news last 2019 there have been attempts to change the provisions on default speed).

82763208 over 5 years ago

See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 for details.

82719698 over 5 years ago

I think it's time you better refer to roads by their name that by numbers. I understand "PH-x" is just the same as "Route x" (which I favor), but if there's a locally known road name, use that. I'm all getting tired of you referring national roads with route numbers by their reference than their name (unless not known).

82703947 over 5 years ago

This edit has been reverted at osm.org/changeset/82704694. Reason: vandalism incident being monitored at https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/60

82704337 over 5 years ago

This edit has been reverted at osm.org/changeset/82704694. Reason: vandalism incident being monitored at https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/60

82704694 over 5 years ago

This edit reverts changesets 82703947 and 82704337 in relation to vandalism incident being tracked on https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/60. User has a habit of making fantasy edits, and is pending a second block.

82139296 over 5 years ago

The user's edits are mostly damaging. While they did do some constructive edits, they do that along with the addition of nonsense. So far as their edit history is concerned, the user do not completely know what they are doing.

I already reported the user to the DWG for the second time, and is pending a longer (or indefinite block). I also set up a ticket at OSMPH papercut_fix on GitHub (at https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/60), and reverted much of the user's latest edits.

82595489 over 5 years ago

I thank you for your contributions to your local area, but please make your edits verifiable to other mappers, and don't add things that are too hard for users to clean up. I'll continue with cleaning up the rest of your edits around your subdivision.

82595489 over 5 years ago

1.) If they are signposted, fine, but I doubt if the HOA ever have designated such routes. I'm getting tired dealing with all the experimental stuff you tend to add.
2.) Please don't add turn restrictions that aren't signed or already implied by traffic rules. You may think it's unsafe to turn to a certain street due to a sharp angle, but for a safety-related turn restriction to be added here, there must be any sign saying so. I doubt ever if the developer have posted any signage indicating those you mapped.

82161680 over 5 years ago

Shouldn't we be mapping employee shuttle bus routes?

81925110 over 5 years ago

Please don't realign Skyway just because MAPS.ME renders Skyway and Osmeña Highway with the same shade of orange. Please see my reply on my last message regarding your latest edits.

81877507 over 5 years ago

I don't think you need to realign Skyway to remove overlaps and superimposition with roads below it.

80764213 over 5 years ago

Correct comment: [Angeles, Pampanga] improve road and building alignment, add new bridge, barangays, and population info, restore street name suffixes per local street name patterns, clean up road network, retag narrow streets and urban barangays where appropriate