TagaSanPedroAko's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
127373821 | almost 3 years ago | Please don't remove the bus stop names. These can be found in the onboard announcements. Better remove closed stops (affected by 2021 network redesign, or the Valley Line). |
126359925 | almost 3 years ago | Roads have been already mapped here so please be careful. |
123589048 | about 3 years ago | Geographically speaking, it's still part of Quezon Province, but the admin_level tag speaks about political territory. Lucena is not under Quezon Province jurisdiction, even if it's still the capital. |
123589048 | about 3 years ago | Lucena is still capital of Quezon Province (admin_level=4), but it's no longer under its jurisdiction (Lucena is highly urbanized city). Please undo. |
123589414 | about 3 years ago | The bypass is still relatively new and most traffic is bus or truck, but whether trunk should be moved back to Poblacion route needs to be discussed first. |
123592226 | about 3 years ago | Fewer vehicles taking the bypass talaga? |
121441172 | about 3 years ago | Reminder lang, di dapat ibinabase sa functional Class ng DPWH ang classification dito. Ngayon, dumami ang primary dito. Please stop! |
121439946 | about 3 years ago | Please, stop this massive classification changes. It's so rash. Not even a good justification. And what I’m seeing is align ing DPWH classification with OSM classification. They don't match. I'll revert. |
121442465 | about 3 years ago | Please be careful!
|
119883606 | over 3 years ago | May alam ba kayo sa lugar? Pinuntahan nyo ba? Sa totoo lang, mukhang bawal po yung ginagawa nyo. |
119883606 | over 3 years ago | Hi po, Nestor Ano'ng source para sa pangalan ng mga kalye? Personal nyo bang pinuntahan yung mga lugar o kinopya nyo lang mula sa ibang mapa o ibang source na di pwedeng pagkunan ng data para sa OSM? |
119602281 | over 3 years ago | Route 70 is a trunk route between Tacloban and Ormoc. Please undo this change. |
118089034 | over 3 years ago | Also don't forget removing verifying presence of concrete barrier on busway from Estrella to MOA. Some sections are separated only by painted yellow line(s) (sometimes mistaken for concrete barrier when mapping from aerial photo, as previous mapping of GenSan-Koronadal as divided), that are better tagged as lane change restriction. Check also latest Mapillary. |
119320343 | over 3 years ago | You've just renamed your account from "Franswa Belhadí", but what's all your reason for adding lots of Spanish names? Some of them cannot be proven, especially ones involving highways generically named "National Road/Highway". (Machine translation) Acabas de cambiar el nombre de tu cuenta de "Franswa Belhadí", pero ¿cuál es la razón por la que agregas muchos nombres en español? Algunas de ellas no pueden ser probadas, especialmente las que involucran carreteras denominadas genéricamente "National Road/Highway" (en inglés). |
118393070 | over 3 years ago | Why mark these proposed roads as under construction? Wondering why. |
118089034 | over 3 years ago | (Just missed a few more words) On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been mapped separately but is not separated by physical barrier. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute. |
118089034 | over 3 years ago | I'm not a fan of mapping sidewalks as separate ways and we generally do not do that here in the Philippines, but yes, we can have an exception if it's separated by impassable barrier (usually railing) or boulevard/grass strip. On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute. Off-topic, but also related to your mapping of present EDSA is some problems with mapping Busway. There's actually no separated bus lane south of Estrella, and existing mapping is inaccurate. |
119157062 | over 3 years ago | Edit has been partially reverted as there is no aerial imagery to prove there is construction ongoing. |
118393070 | over 3 years ago | Hi there. People have been showing concerns that You have been retagging roads which are not yet under construction as of now. For this one, there is yet no imagery to prove Santo Tomas IC is under construction. Please refrain from editing such roads until there are any visible proof of construction. |
89798011 | over 3 years ago | 2 years had past, but doesn't seem to be the case. UN Avenue is stil 4 lanes from recent aerial. Your change is completely speculative |