Hi, why creating a Fann perfumery that is already there for 10 years?

Hi, how did you find out the street name? Are they any street signs showing it? The official kadastre map does not have a name for this street.

Dakujem za otvorenie ciest.
Ale preco je len kratky usek osm.org/way/963239191 jednosmerny?

Additionally, you changed "disused:" prefix to "was:" prefix, which have different meaning. This change again isn't needed for the problem you are solving.

Ok, maybe, but the route=bus tags are not mandatory, especially in a relation that is not type=route. That change didn't need to be done.

A aky zdroj je OFM 23?

Stanica Filialka nefunguje/neexistuje. Naco je dobre ju pridavat ako funkcnu stanicu?

Why do you put outdoor_seating=no on every building, that does not even have any amenity (like a restaurant) that could have outdoor seating?

Ok, thanks.

What triangle is not valid? Why do you write that into every changeset?

Also please do not add duplicate restaurants, even with lower quality data than the existing one.

There is no asphalt at osm.org/way/681682383 . What are you trying to do?

Zdravim, preco bolo potrebne bicycle=yes na osm.org/node/330748931 ? Cez 'entrance' by malo pustit vsetky formy dopravy. Aka navigacia s tym nefunguje?

Super, dakujem za prelozenie liniek MHD.

Yes, the relation had no valid 'type', intentionally. Now it still does not have a valid type. Why do you think your solution is better?

Super, dakujem.

Hi, you should add the 'disused:' prefix into the existing tag, like "amenity=pub" -> "disused:amenity=pub", not invent a new tag like shop=yes (which actually has almost zero information and does not relate to what kind of amenity is disused). If you want to mark a vacant shop space/premise, you tag shop=vacant (without any disused prefix).

What kind of piste should osm.org/way/1222203464 be ? You did not add any details, if it is cross-country skiing or downhill. highway=piste does not mean much. Also it is there is no piste to be seen on Ortofotomozaika (but that one is older than your visit, so maybe they built a piste there now, but it needs more details added.

Dakujem, podla popisu to vyzera teraz lepsie. Aj ked teda to parkovisko nad vezou by som potom dal 'private', kedze hodnota 'permit' znamena, ze povolenie si treba vyziadat, ale dostane ho bezne skoro kazdy (len musi vybavit potrebne procedury). To asi nie je tento pripad, ked povolenie dostanu len najomcovia a zamestnanci. Dal by som teda 'private', ze len vlastnik a nim par vybranych subjektov, nie ktokolvek.

A co tie male parkoviska za Hotelom FIS ako osm.org/node/6935344392 ? Tam mozu tiez len zakaznici (ako je to teraz nakreslene), alebo len zamestnanci?

Tiez sa vsetky 3 velke parkoviska nazyvaju "Lyžiarsky areál Štrbské Pleso" hoci maju 3 rozne rezimy parkovania a prevadzkovatelov?

Zdroj?

To forester's_lodge je hrozne. Co s tym urobime?