amosharper's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
169459358 | 3 days ago | (Don't beat me up for invading your turf, Bexhill-OSM). |
169329502 | 6 days ago | (and modified coffee room "cuisine" tags to correct mispelling and use more common values) |
169278439 | 7 days ago | @JamesCPrentice you've accidentally marked the entirety of St Leonards-on-sea as a single house in this edit. This has raised a number of errors - please do check your edits carefully before submitting. I'll revert. Thanks. |
169007596 | 12 days ago | Hello - I'm a bit confused about this edit. My existing buildings here were accurate to the shape of the building and the cadastral map. The newly drawn buildings are less accurate (you can compare with a less-frequently-updated tiling service like some of the layers on https://graphhopper.com/maps/) and do not line up with the cadastral map - it looks like the rooves have been traced rather than the bases of the buldings. Was there an error that caused my submission to need to be redrawn? |
167575210 | about 2 months ago | *Oops, 'The Cake Box' |
167449341 | about 2 months ago | (and fixed building levels that were marked underground) |
166267518 | 2 months ago | Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in several countries across Europe. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks! Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
166120743 | 3 months ago | 💚 |
165703100 | 3 months ago | I'm not sure what editor you're using, but I'd *really* encourage you to adopt three changes to your editing: 1. *Please* check your edits before submitting. The amount you're contributing is great and it's nice to see another local editor, but accuracy is really important. osm.wiki/Accuracy 2. Do try to align your building footprints to the base of the building. It's worth using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to align the satellite imagery.
3. Consider squaring your buildings' corners - this will bring curved edges into line and give near-right-angles proper right angles.
Thank you! |
165703100 | 3 months ago | Hello - quick issue here, seven buildings on Princes Rd have been given the house number "1", and many of them are marked as being several lasyers below ground level. |
165671041 | 3 months ago | Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in Portugal, Belgium and Thailand. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks! Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
165518584 | 3 months ago | Hello - it's hard to explain without visuals, but take 6 The Uplands as an example:
Two of the nodes in the perimeter way have addr:housenumber and addr:street properties:
I guess this is because you've copied and edited the way from another on Silchester Road. The address properties on the nodes should be removed, since you've already got address properties on the way as a whole. |
165482724 | 3 months ago | Please don't use the "name" key for building descriptions such as way 1381525736 "Three rear flats - Residential" or 1381665071 "Rear flats". Thanks. |
165551164 | 3 months ago | Hello! Please note that the "name" feature should be used only for the primary name of a building and not a description, such as "Block fo Flats" [sic] in way 1382013516 or "Antique Shop" in way 1382013510, both on the west half of Norman Road. Thanks. |
165542362 | 3 months ago | Way number 1381957720 seems to have postcodes as addr:housenumber here. Could you please check? |
165518584 | 3 months ago | Another note - at least 14 of these buildings have an address node as part of the area way (outline) listing them as number 36 - could you please check? |
165517660 | 3 months ago | This looks to also be true of changeset 165518584. |
165517660 | 3 months ago | At least 45 of these buildings have an address node as part of the area way (outline) listing them as number 36 - could you please check? |
165518584 | 3 months ago | Hello - there are four houses called "Tapshaw" in this edit. I'm guessing that's an error? |
163834257 | 4 months ago | Is this an accurate change - is access not permitted or possible for any vehicles on the stretch of road south-west of Tilekiln Lane, or is it rather that traffic is restricted? Note that the lane was already tagged for private vehicle use and unclassified. |