OpenStreetMap ロゴ OpenStreetMap

Changeset 日時 コメント
169459358 4日前

(Don't beat me up for invading your turf, Bexhill-OSM).

169329502 6日前

(and modified coffee room "cuisine" tags to correct mispelling and use more common values)

169278439 7日前

@JamesCPrentice you've accidentally marked the entirety of St Leonards-on-sea as a single house in this edit. This has raised a number of errors - please do check your edits carefully before submitting. I'll revert. Thanks.

169007596 13日前

Hello - I'm a bit confused about this edit. My existing buildings here were accurate to the shape of the building and the cadastral map. The newly drawn buildings are less accurate (you can compare with a less-frequently-updated tiling service like some of the layers on https://graphhopper.com/maps/) and do not line up with the cadastral map - it looks like the rooves have been traced rather than the bases of the buldings. Was there an error that caused my submission to need to be redrawn?

167575210 約2ヶ月前

*Oops, 'The Cake Box'

167449341 約2ヶ月前

(and fixed building levels that were marked underground)

166267518 2ヶ月前

Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in several countries across Europe. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks!

Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

166120743 3ヶ月前

💚

165703100 3ヶ月前

I'm not sure what editor you're using, but I'd *really* encourage you to adopt three changes to your editing:

1. *Please* check your edits before submitting. The amount you're contributing is great and it's nice to see another local editor, but accuracy is really important. osm.wiki/Accuracy

2. Do try to align your building footprints to the base of the building. It's worth using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to align the satellite imagery.
https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/

3. Consider squaring your buildings' corners - this will bring curved edges into line and give near-right-angles proper right angles.
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Thank you!

165703100 3ヶ月前

Hello - quick issue here, seven buildings on Princes Rd have been given the house number "1", and many of them are marked as being several lasyers below ground level.

165671041 3ヶ月前

Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in Portugal, Belgium and Thailand. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks!

Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

165518584 3ヶ月前

Hello - it's hard to explain without visuals, but take 6 The Uplands as an example:
osm.org/way/1381713422

Two of the nodes in the perimeter way have addr:housenumber and addr:street properties:
osm.org/node/12792117571
osm.org/node/12792117576

I guess this is because you've copied and edited the way from another on Silchester Road. The address properties on the nodes should be removed, since you've already got address properties on the way as a whole.

165482724 3ヶ月前

Please don't use the "name" key for building descriptions such as way 1381525736 "Three rear flats - Residential" or 1381665071 "Rear flats". Thanks.

osm.wiki/Key:name

165551164 3ヶ月前

Hello! Please note that the "name" feature should be used only for the primary name of a building and not a description, such as "Block fo Flats" [sic] in way 1382013516 or "Antique Shop" in way 1382013510, both on the west half of Norman Road. Thanks.

165542362 3ヶ月前

Way number 1381957720 seems to have postcodes as addr:housenumber here. Could you please check?

165518584 3ヶ月前

Another note - at least 14 of these buildings have an address node as part of the area way (outline) listing them as number 36 - could you please check?

165517660 3ヶ月前

This looks to also be true of changeset 165518584.

osm.org/changeset/165518584

165517660 3ヶ月前

At least 45 of these buildings have an address node as part of the area way (outline) listing them as number 36 - could you please check?

165518584 3ヶ月前

Hello - there are four houses called "Tapshaw" in this edit. I'm guessing that's an error?

163834257 4ヶ月前

Is this an accurate change - is access not permitted or possible for any vehicles on the stretch of road south-west of Tilekiln Lane, or is it rather that traffic is restricted? Note that the lane was already tagged for private vehicle use and unclassified.