Based on their website this looks like the address of their corporate headquarters:
https://corp.summitsports.com/contact-us-3/
I've changed the address to the one shown on the Bloomfield Hills page

I actually moved the address from a duplicate node to the node with the shop info

Please keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is relied upon by a variety of services and is most definitely not a playground. Before you make any more test edits you should read osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Thanks for responding! Yeah, it looks like its pretty narrow so I would change this to a driveway and maybe changing the access to private if there is a gate there and/or is signed as private. Looking forward to your future contributions, it's nice to see some more mappers in Oregon!

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Can you specify why the road was incorrect? From the imagery it looks like this road connects to the houses on the other side of the stream.

Hi Fred73000,
Both additions of not:brand:wikidata in this changeset seem to be instances in which it actually is the brand iD is trying to match it with. I've just preserved the names for NAPA via (https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/commit/4921a9e69d5cc1eef1a4b2dee8dd28b47c79fac8) so that iD won't suggest to replace the name tag for shops like Raleigh Hills Automotive with unique names. Until the next version of NSI is released, I suggest that you ignore instances of iD matching to NAPA instead of adding a not:brand:wikidata tag.

As for Bike Gallery, all of their stores have been rebranded to Trek after they were bought out. See https://bikeportland.org/2021/01/26/bike-gallery-owner-sells-all-six-portland-stores-to-trek-bicycle-corp-325215

Please consult other sources before adding not:brand:wikidata in places you're unfamiliar with in the future.

-archpdx

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your recent contributions. Please note that we don't use names to describe things on the map (see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For example, for osm.org/node/9236934919 you should remove the name and instead make this point a 'Viewpoint'.

Linked wrong source - it should be https://www.co.washington.or.us/apps/permitsmisc/?tlno=1S212DB04200

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, please don't add duplicate address nodes - in this scenario the node you added at the end of the driveway was sufficient.

Additionally, we don't use names to describe features on the map, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I removed the name from the driveway and address and removed the duplicate address for the entrance. If this driveway is gated you can add a gate point along the driveway.

-archpdx

Hi,
It looks like this parking lot was tagged as area=yes instead of amenity=parking so I fixed this

Hi Redblue37 and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding the address for this building.

-archpdx

Thanks for catching this!

Whoops, I probably should've taken a look at Streetside before changing this to Jacksons - in the area I'm at all Shell convenience stores are Jacksons. After looking at the Streetside imagery, I've changed this to a Shell convenience store

Hi, thanks for adding this new subdivision! There are a few things about this changeset that I want to point out:
1. Please don't abbreviate street names, see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
2. Although there isn't a consensus about this, many mappers discourage connecting the edges of landuse (such as residential areas) to roads
3. Realign the imagery to the existing roads so that all features are uniformally aligned - you can adjust this at the bottom of the Background menu

Looking forward to your future contributions!

-archpdx

If there's going to be construction here, I would make this area a greenfield with the name, or a construction area if construction is already going on.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your recent contributions to the map. Cul-de-sacs like the one on 117th Ct should be a turning circle instead of a separate way as based on the imagery vehicles can traverse through the middle, so I changed it to just a turning circle. If you need any further help feel free to respond to my comment.

Thanks,
archpdx

Hi,
In the future please use more descriptive changeset comments - 'date added' makes it difficult for other mappers to see what you've changed in your changesets. For example, 'added access tags' would've been sufficient here. You can read more about what makes a 'good' changeset comment here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Why did you remove the building?
I've reverted this change in changeset 113299828

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these buildings. Quick tip - when adding buildings press `q` while selecting to square the corners. You can also hold down shift while clicking to select multiple features. If you need any further help feel free to respond to this comment.

Thanks,
archpdx

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding these new houses. Quick tip - when selecting a house you can press `q` to make to make the angles perpendicular. I recommend you do this for these houses as they seem to have only right angles. You can easily do this my selecting all of these while holding down shift. If you need any further assistance, feel free to respond to my comment.