Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds shipping container stacks as buildings, which is not correct. Please note that we don't map temporary features like this in OSM

Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds shipping container stacks as buildings, which is not correct. Please note that we don't map temporary features like this in OSM

Hi and welcome to OepnStreetMap! Thanks for fixing the name for this street. Please note, however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (see osm.wiki/abbreviation). In this case, 'May St' should be unabbreviated to 'May Street'

Hi,

I noticed that this changeset adds airports that no longer exist, and where the land it sits on has already been redeveloped since. This would be more appropriate for OpenHistoricalMap (https://openhistoricalmap.org) as we map what's on the ground here on OSM (osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground)

Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds a fire pit as a park. This should instead be tagged as `leisure=firepit`: osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfirepit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152636807

Hi,
This changeset seems to tag this segment of Bristol with `access=destination`. This tag should only be used for roads that are explicitly signed to not allow any thru traffic (see osm.wiki/Tag:access=destination)

Hi,
What is your reasoning for marking this segment of Harbor as closed? As far as I can tell, there don't seem to be any long-term closures for Harbor

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I notice that this changeset adds `foot=no` to some segments of Scholls Ferry and Shattuck. This tag should only be added in places where foot traffic is illegal and explicitly marked with a sign indicating so, which doesn't seem to be the case here. The existing `sidewalk=no` tag on its own should be adequate to convey that it might be dangerous for pedestrians.

It appears that this changeset designates I-15 as a toll road when this isn't the case. It appears that only the express lanes are tolled, so adding `toll=yes` wouldn't be appropriate in this case. Instead, a pipe-delimited `toll:lanes=*` tag should be used to show which lanes have a toll and which ones do not.

As it has been pointed out to you previously, we don't abbreviate street names in OSM
osm.org/user_blocks/15468

What is the source for adding this gas station? After taking a look at aerial imagery, it appears that this is a private residence.

It appears that this changeset creates a duplicate POI for Lucky Mak's

Existing POI: osm.org/node/10031906920
Duplicated POI: osm.org/node/12056077452

Also, it appears that you are editing on behalf of a company. If so, that's perfectly fine, but we require that you comply with OpenStreetMap's organized editing guidelines and document the activities your company is doing on the wiki:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

For example, (osm.org/way/125083408) with `hov:lanes=1` should be `lanes:hov=1`.

The way you used `hov:lanes=*` for Century Freeway is correct (osm.org/way/882322789)

I noticed that this changeset seems to be using `hov:lanes=*` to denote how many lanes are HOV lanes, when this tag should be used to denote which lanes are HOV lanes as outlined on the wiki (osm.wiki/Key:hov#hov:lanes=*). Instead, `lanes:hov=*` should be used (see osm.wiki/Key:lanes#Description).

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears that this changeset adds a bar in the middle of Science Grove, however it doesn't look like this is reflected in aerial imagery. Can you confirm whether this was placed in the correct place?

Hi and welcome to OSM!

It appears that this changeset adds access=no to a trail. According to RLIS, this property is owned by Metro and City of Gresham. There is also evidence that this is a regularly traveled trail from Strava heatmap. Unless it's specifically signed prohibit access from the general public, access=no shouldn't be added to this path.

Hi and welcome to OSM!

It appears that this changeset adds access=no to a trail. According to RLIS, this property is owned by Metro and City of Gresham. There is also evidence that this is a regularly traveled trail from Strava heatmap. Unless it's specifically signed prohibit access from the general public, access=no shouldn't be added to this path.

Hi and welcome to OSM!

It appears that this changeset adds access=no to a trail. According to RLIS, this property is owned by Metro and City of Gresham. There is also evidence that this is a regularly traveled trail from Strava heatmap. Unless it's specifically signed prohibit access from the general public, access=no shouldn't be added to this path.

It appears this changeset adds 'religion=buddhist' to nodes that are apart of ways that had 'denomination=buddhist' (for example osm.org/node/2470898423).

From what I understand, that paragraph applies to well documented cases such as 'St.' placenames in the UK. The consensus seems to be to expand directional prefixes/suffixes on street names regardless or not if this is what governmental agencies list them as. For example, (osm.org/way/114035456) is named 'Southwest Roy Rogers Road' despite it 'officially' being listed as 'SW Roy Rogers Rd' on RLIS and physical signs. Regardless, I encourage you to continue this discussion on either the forum (https://c.osm.org) or the OSMUS Slack (https://openstreetmap.us/slack) to allow other mappers to weigh in.