Fyi this changeset was carried out fully manually and because most objects would be obvious typos only, was done in a single changeset.

Changes can be found here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149242484

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I have reverted the modification of the name tag. The signage differs between segments of this road and is already properly tagged. You can check this by going into the editor, choosing on the right the button under the layer menu (data menu) and enabling Mapillary street level imagery.

Regards,

Daniel

osm.org/changeset/149014425

Hey BrieQ,

I will again mention the POI details are already on the building in this case, so please change the building details instead if needed.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey BrieQ,

The details for Guineys are already present on the building;
osm.org/way/332773284/history
The node you added looks mostly like a duplicate.
You should change the details on the building in this case.
(In most countries it is okay for either the building or a node to be used for the POI details); this may be inconsistent across the city.

Padmore and Barnes looks okay, assuming it still sells several completely different types of products in a single building (shoes and cameras).

Regards,

Daniel

Hey BrieQ,

What is your source for removing the note this POI may be permanently closed?

Also, please properly describe your changes in the changeset comment when saving, instead of solely using ambiguous hashtags. Changes could be additions, modifications or deletions to/of objects or certain details, where needed with explicit reason. This will help other mappers identify and verify your changes.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148971650

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am changing the species tag you added to 'genus'.
osm.org/changeset/149011719

As you can see from 'genus:en', it is actually a genus. A species is i.e. 'Fagus Sylvatica' (European Beech);
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q146149

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145423979

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am reverting again the addition of a noexit tag on a wall.
This time the noexit tag is already present on the road next to it, so no further changes are needed.
osm.org/changeset/149011687

Your changes (full changeset)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144225721

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am reverting the addition of a noexit tag on the end node of a wall. It is redundant on non-routable ways.
osm.org/changeset/149011665

If you still remember, what were you trying to add the noexit tag to, and why?
The road(s) next to it all seem to be fine as-is, including the one underneath the bridge.

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144225721

Regards,

Daniel

Added in
osm.org/changeset/148748984

Hey Anne,

Why did you tag this as settlement?

Regards,

Daniel

*ref:IE:smr of course

This changeset reverts
osm.org/changeset/148270997

Hey Anne,

This was a temporary start/end-ramp for the motorway when it was under construction. It was constructed in segments, which are still tagged as such, i.e. to/from
osm.org/node/1907545966
(Cashel - Cullahill -- Cullahill - Portlaoise);
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R639_road_(Ireland)#20th_and_21st_centuries

This changeset has been reverted by
osm.org/changeset/148740347

Your changes
osm.org/way/1257998131

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Brian,

I found a possible duplicate
osm.org/node/10311223366
of an existing AED
osm.org/node/10311223364

They have similar location but different opening hours. They were added at the same time.
Could you check it is a duplicate? If not, whether the location I have chosen is okay? You can remove the fixme, or remove the duplicate.

Regards,

Daniel

(Testing features with OpenAEDMap to check if they work properly.)

(Testing some features of MapComplete to check if they work properly. You can ignore this edit.)

If not already clear, I assume the access is no longer "no" for the same reason, or it should be a more specific mode of transport.

osm.org/changeset/148333129
I assume it is open/traversable again. Is it in any way wet, is it flood prone, or was there only a sewer failure or similar? Just to clarify for other mappers.

Regardless, you can remove the tags
access=no
ford=yes
(ford only remains useful if there is permanently, or for long periods some water)

Hey Anne,

The file points to a different HEV entry. There is seemingly no HEV entry for this one.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Lukas,

OpenStreetMap is bovenal een database, niet een specifieke kaart.

Het toevoegen van tags slechts voor weergave in applicaties die deze tag (nog) niet weergeven wordt over het algemeen gezien als 'tagging for the renderer' (onnodig, incorrecte labeltjes plakken). Lees hier meer
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
(Als we op alle lockers 'storage rental' plakken zullen data-gebruikers hier trouwens rekening mee moeten houden.)

Het staat je vrij om een applicatie te ontwikkelen(, voor te stellen), of mbv bv. overpass of umap deze data direct te gebruiken en te delen.
(voor hulp kan je altijd terecht in het forum.)

Dit zijn je veranderingen
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142096535

Ik heb handmatig alleen de shop=storage_rental tag verwijderd.
osm.org/changeset/147603195

Het beste is om met de gemeenschap tot een overeenkomst te komen hoe deze nieuwe labels er uit moeten komen te zien. Goed om te zien dat je meedenkt hierover.

Verder kan je nog zorgen dat je er zoveel mogelijk in kaart brengt (en er foto's van maken met bv. Mapillary). Als meer mensen dit doen is het duidelijk dat er vraag naar is en heb je meer voorbeelden.

Overigens ziet het er zo prima uit. Zolang er nog geen overeenkomst is over de tagging kan je naar eigen voorkeur een tag gebruiken.
osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like

Groet,

Daniel