osm.org/way/1395063538
I am not sure building with gaping holes in walls is still house?
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=52.895576~-7.146993&lvl=17&dir=72.314&style=x&v=2&sV=1
(use for reference only, use Bing Streetside as provided in editor instead though it is basically a mirror with lesser quality images due to a bug)

Maybe it is ruins?

Tagged both as abandoned for now.
Other contributors can add/verify further details (on location / on the ground) for fountains/memorials as needed.

Articles (used for reference only)

Stoneleigh and Cheam memorials
- Nonsuch park. Epsom & Ewell History Explorer.
Photo of Stoneleigh memorial ca. 1930s (incompletely labelled).
Mention of Cheam memorial car crash article which is also linked below.
https://eehe.org.uk/25296/nonsuchpark/

Stoneleigh memorial
- Waymarking article
Mentions fountain for Stoneleigh memorial is defunct.
https://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/wmNTDM_Charlotte_Farmer_London_Road_Ewell_Surrey_UK

Cheam memorial
- Cheam, Nonsuch Park, Bellgate Entrance 1925. Francis Frith Collection.
Mentions Cheam memorial was moved.
https://www.francisfrith.com/cheam/cheam-nonsuch-park-bellgate-entrance-1925_77073
- Car crash destroys Victorian monument at Nonsuch Park. Your Local Guardian. August 27, 2013.
About Cheam memorial
https://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/10635908.car-crash-destroys-victorian-monument-at-nonsuch-park/
- Cheam Monument Begins Restoration Two Years After Destruction. This Local London. January 8, 2016.
Mentions remaining foundations.
https://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/young-reporter/1877/

See also Geograph (mirrored on Commons), Commons and Historic England entries.
There do not currently seem to be (local) Historic Environment Records for these memorials.

osm.org/way/1414084463
This seems to be path. Where they are changes from time to time.
(Compare with Esri Clarity)
There is no archaeological site indicated on historic maps/viewer.

Hey JayBee,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Local knowledge is a valid source for OpenStreetMap, but regardless I have checked the information you provided.

On historical maps, the label does point more clearly to the adjacent building in the 25 inch (which we can use only for reference, not for mapping, as it is still copyrighted and otherwise not explicitly permitted for use by National Library of Scotland.

However, the NIAH/NBHS building inventory
https://www.buildingsofireland.ie/buildings-search/building/12401306/clomantagh-lower-clomantagh-kilkenny
does mention it was in use as RIC barracks.
(maybe it counts adjacent building as part of it)

but a discussion on a blog post article which you may or may not be aware of, which includes (family of) owner, mentions similar idea as you do, where it was barely in use as RIC barracks (but due to rumors people assumed it was built as or always used as such).
https://theirishaesthete.com/2016/12/14/an-architectural-conundrum-update/

Resolved in
osm.org/changeset/169609975

Changes visualised
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169609975

Sidenote: Changed name to description, since this seems to be case of descriptive name
osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
in Ireland users tend to use the name tag anyways, but usually it should be only done where it was the common name. (due to being solely outbuilding I assume it's not the case)

Message privé reçu de l'utilisateur (en anglais ci-dessous)
«
Daniel,

je vous prie de m'excuser. Étant donné que vous avez apporté tant de contributions en Irlande, je suppose que votre langue principale est l'anglais. (Mais cela serait plus clair si la langue était indiquée sur nos profils OSM.)

Je m'y suis rendu : sur le menu, il était indiqué que le restaurant était ouvert de 17 h à 21 h 30. Le propriétaire m'a dit qu'il avait créé la page Google. Plus tard, j'ai vu sur la page Google que le restaurant était ouvert de 18 h à 21 h 30. J'ai donc téléphoné pour vérifier. 18 h est la bonne heure.

- Comme le propriétaire m'avait dit qu'il avait des problèmes avec les mauvais commentaires sur les anciens propriétaires, toujours affichés sur plusieurs sites web, j'ai essayé de l'aider en ajoutant ou en modifiant l'adresse sur quelques sites. Et plus tard, j'ai créé deux liens depuis la page OSM vers PagesJaunes.fr et Google. Mauvaise idée.

Encore une fois, je m'excuse.

Cordialement,
»

---

Received private message from user
"
Daniel,

my apologies. As you made so many contributions in Ireland, I suppose your main langage is english. (But it would be most clear if the langage was displayed on our OSM profiles.)

-I went there: on the menu, it was written opened from 17:00 to 21:30 (5pm to 9:30pm). The owner told me he had created the Google page. Latter I saw on the Google page, it was opened from 18:00 to 21:30. So I phoned to check. 18:00 is the good value.

-As the owner had told me he had problems with bad comments about the previous owners, still displayed on several web sites, I tried to help adding or changing the address on a few sites. And later, creating 2 links from the OSM page, to PagesJaunes.fr and to Google. Bad idea.

Again I apologize.

Best regards,
"

---

Erreur accidentelle corrigée dans /
Accidental mistake resolved in
osm.org/changeset/169427386

osm.org/relation/19385743

Preferably simple polygons are added as area, not multipolygon, unless not otherwise possible, or prefered by the local community (which it is unlikely to be).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169424226

Si vous avez inspecté le restaurant sur place (sur le terrain, de près) et que vous utilisez uniquement Google pour le montrer à d'autres personnes afin qu'elles puissent le vérifier, vous ou quelqu'un d'autre pouvez supprimer le lien source vers Google.
Nous pouvons utiliser les données du site web officiel du restaurant, s'il en possède un, pour contribuer à OpenStreetMap, mais uniquement si vous pouvez facilement vous rendre au restaurant pour vérifier ces données.
Notez que les balises source sont redondantes, vous devriez plutôt utiliser la source du changeset lorsque vous téléchargez les modifications dans l'application d'édition, bien que cela puisse encore être utile si le restaurant a récemment ouvert et n'est pas encore visible sur les images de rue, bien sûr.
Vous devez ajouter la balise website pour créer un lien vers le site web officiel s'il en existe un.
Sinon, vous pouvez toujours ajouter les réseaux sociaux avec les balises contact:*, c'est-à-dire contact:facebook, s'il en existe. (non, il n'y a pas de contact:google_maps..)

Si vous avez utilisé les données Google pour contribuer directement à OpenStreetMap, sans vérifier sur le terrain ou au moins en consultant le site web officiel, la modification doit être annulée (refaite) et/ou vous devez effectuer une vérification sur le terrain afin de pouvoir vérifier votre modification et la conserver dans OpenStreetMap.

---

If you did survey the restaurant on the ground (on location, from up close), and only use Google to show to others so they can verify it, then you or someone else can remove the source link to Google.
We can use data from the restaurant's official website, if it has one, for contributing to OpenStreetMap, but only if you can easily visit the restaurant to verify this data.
Note, source tags are redundant, you should use the changeset source when uploading the modifications in the editor application instead, though it can still be useful if the restaurant was recently opened and not visible on street level imagery yet, of course.
You should add the website tag to link to the official website if it has one.
Otherwise you can still add the social media with contact:* tags, i.e. contact:facebook, if it has those. (no, there is no contact:google_maps..)

if you used Google data to contribute to OpenStreetMap directly, without verifying by surveying on the ground, or at least by checking official website, then the modification should be reverted (undone) and/or you should survey it on the ground so you can verify your modification and it can be kept in OpenStreetMap.

Salut Mathieu65, (anglais ci-dessous)

As-tu inspecté les lieux sur place ?
osm.wiki/FR:V%C3%A9rifiabilit%C3%A9

N'utilise pas les données Google pour contribuer à OpenStreetMap, s'il te plaît. C'est interdit. Consulte cette page du wiki OSM (en anglais) :
osm.wiki/Google

Si vous avez des questions sur la façon de cartographier, vous pouvez contacter votre communauté (locale) à l'adresse suivante :
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.63517,-7.04645&zoom=5.46
ou lancer un fil de discussion sur :
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Bonne cartographie :-)

Cordialement,

Daniel

Traduit avec deepl.com/translator

---

Hey Mathieu65,

Did you survey the location on the ground?
osm.wiki/FR:V%C3%A9rifiabilit%C3%A9

Do not use Google data for contributing to OpenStreetMap, please. It is prohibited. See this OSM Wiki page (in English)
osm.wiki/Google

If you have any questions on how to map, you can contact your (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.63517,-7.04645&zoom=5.46
or start a thread on
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Happy mapping :-)

Regards,

Daniel

Hey kenda,

Check out StreetComplete 61.2
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/releases/tag/v61.2

There are now more quests available for toilets and showers, so you should also be able to check i.e. if the shower next to it still exists (at least, it should ask for it, it hasn't been updated in 9 years..)
osm.org/node/4325019892
(of course many toilets and showers are usually permanent.)

Regards,

Daniel

osm.org/node/8739963966
Bus stop currently has route ref KK2 but is (only) part of relation for 838. Should it be (also) part of KK2 sub-relation, or is one of these inaccurate?

Hey John,

Did you survey each defibrillator individually, on the ground, and manually added them; or
did you (semi-)automatically import/copy-paste them from elsewhere (websites, articles, files, etc.); or
were they supplied by yourself (from files/website/... which you own) / by someone else requesting to add them to OpenStreetMap (from files/website/... which they own)?

If you surveyed them, it looks good. Just make sure to carefully add the details when you are doing this many of them. You can easily make typos or copy-paste mistakes.

Otherwise, please adhere to the import guidelines
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
and Automated Edits code of conduct
osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

I assume it is with good intent, of course; and you have been editing for longer without negative feedback as far as I can see.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=457933

Regardless, this is a changeset from two years ago, so this comment is a bit late.

Your changes visualised
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132416773

Regards,

Daniel

second URL should be
https://www.corko.net/news/autumn-league-2-garretstown-wood-ballinspittle-tuesday-september-6th-results-and-report

Best recent picture is likely this one
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1199185162220307&set=a.103290421809792
(for reference only, not for use on OSM without explicit permission.)

I assume you mean the corner pillar.
Fyi on Mapillary 2024 it wraps around the corner, so I would map it as such (single building part).

There are signs outside the entrance but it is too dark even if I increase the brightness on the Panoramax website itself. There might be a cabinet below the signs?

https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=c6e6096e-ca31-44f9-afd9-54632de2ea19&focus=pic

Hey Tobiemh,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Could you please tell me if it is the same or a different defibrillator than the one "left of the reception desk" at
osm.org/node/10230966127

The one you mapped mentions it is outdoor, but that could have been added by mistake (no worries, it can happen). It is useful to describe exactly where the defibrillator is located (level, room, facility, wall/desk/...), if possible.
(level is additionally described by 'level' tag)

There is currently no street level imagery of the souterrain (?) in front of the hotel, only outside of the ground floor.
https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=35fff52b-d737-4afc-839e-bdb05b032be7&focus=pic

If you are willing, you can take a picture (preferably of both, if they are different) and upload it to one of the following applications, where you can also add more information.
(the first one you are using already)
- [OpenAEDMap](https://openaedmap.org/nl/#map=19/52.6497559/-7.25309&node_id=12964102501) (Web, Android, iOS);
Photo uploaded to and permanently hosted on their own server only.
- [MapComplete](https://mapcomplete.org/aed?z=18.6&lat=52.649820742620705&lon=-7.252925834794496#node/12964102501) (Web, mobile web);
Photo uploaded to and permanently hosted on [Panoramax](https://panoramax.fr/).
- [StreetComplete](https://streetcomplete.app/) (Android, currently [being ported to iOS](https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/5421));
Photo uploaded to and hosted on their own server, only temporarily until limited time after note is closed.
(which means it can not be used at later time to verify details anymore..)
You will have to look for the Defibrillator Location quest (or other quest at the same exact position), while for adding a photo or other details they have their own [Notes features](osm.wiki/StreetComplete#Additional_Features).

Mentioned applications host photos using an open license (or are otherwise compatible), allowing other contributors to use them for OpenStreetMap.

If you only want to add more information, you can also do this directly in the "iD editor" (Click on "Edit" on osm.org), or by [opening a note](osm.wiki/Notes#Using_notes) on osm.org.

If you have any questions on how to map, you can contact your (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.63517,-7.04645&zoom=5.46
or start a thread on
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Happy mapping :-)

Regards,

Daniel

PS: sorry if links with display text in this message are not correctly shown.

Now visible on Mapilio 2024-05-19.
Added details in
osm.org/changeset/167877756

Hey enable_15,

This is an object which was surveyed (not added from aerial imagery) by a user who likes to add additional detail. This might be correct (solely inaccurate) data, though it is not always flawless (first part can be checked by looking at object history, second part you would need to know the mappers of course, third part some tagging experience is useful)
It is likely they added 'unknown' because it is not signed on this specific object (numerous old sewer vents have their manufacturer signed, modern ones do less/not)
It might be better replaced with manufacturer:signed=no .
Understandably, contributors do not always take a (permanent, compatibly licensed) picture, so it is okay if this is hard to verify for you.
You can always ask the user in the changeset where they added the tag if you are unsure.

I would suggest starting with simple mapping for your first changes, not jumping into challenges and automated edits straight away.
Generally, you should start with small changes and keep them local
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(here: size is proverbially speaking, this specific changeset's size (single object) is fine.)
Otherwise, make sure you check each object manually and properly research, document and communicate your changes.

See also
- osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand
- osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
(includes 'semi-'automated changes)

If you need help mapping, you can contact your (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/
or start a thread at
https://openstreetmap.community/

Regards,

Daniel

Replaced note with fixme.
osm.org/changeset/167583006

Changed to vacant shop with lifecycle
osm.org/changeset/167581189

changes visualised
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167581189
(change itself might not show yet)