Hey TXPeig,

"<object x> update <version number>" does not describe the changes you've made in a changeset.

Please use good changeset comments, see the page below;
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

In addition, I would appreciate it if you replied to this changeset comment so I know you've seen it.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Victor,

I would suggest using
subject:wikidata

osm.wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_links

Is there a reason you used "related" instead?

Regards,

Daniel

Hey egmont,

Your cliffs seem to be pointing upslope.

As you have almost 31k changesets, I'm sure you are aware there are multiple aerial imagery layers available in the editor; see
osm.wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique#Aerial_Imagery

I would recommend checking other imagery layers to find how to map the cliffs. Bing does not show height differences well.
You can right click a line like a cliff and "reverse" it to make the triangles which stick out on the side of the line to point down the hillside.

We do usually not map herders paths, dry water flow over flat bedrock plateaus, archeological sites or similar. Paths and waterways have to be physically present (at least clearly visible; signed is also helpful) to be mapped. Read the following page on good practice, please.
osm.wiki/Good_practice

The archeological sites you have mapped are mostly holes rather than hills in the landscape and othwerwise are also unverifiable.

If you continue to map like this it may be considered vandalism.

Regards,

Daniel

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.

Kind regards,

Daniel

On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.

Kind regards,

Daniel

On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community.

Reverted the removal of the building tag in
osm.org/changeset/116022541

For the building=* tag I'd use =yes, as I don't see a good value for it.

I think social facility covers it better than community centre as it's focused on (health) services rather than activities (see McGrath center).

It's possible to tag amenity=social_facility with social_facility=day_care for the day services.
osm.wiki/Key:social_facility

The therapy services can be indicated with the healthcare / healthcare:speciality keys
osm.wiki/Key:healthcare

Could you add the building tag, please? You can always add other tags such as the ones above later if needed.

(I read on their Facebook a specialised pre-school function is also included, but while it overlaps with amenity=kindergarten I think it's better to leave it like this.)

If there are no outdoor areas, the tags are applied to the building.
( osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility#How_to_map )

If the amenity shares a boundary with a building, *both* features are mapped on a single area element.
( osm.wiki/Key:amenity )

This means building=yes should be retained.

An exception would be i.e. amenity=shelter, which does not need e.g. building=roof as it's not much of a building.

Hey Anne,

I see you tagged a number nodes, such as osm.org/node/9370874597/history
as bumps. However, some of them are quite long for a bump. I would usually tag this as a "table";
osm.wiki/Key:traffic_calming#By_causing_vertical_deviation
as at this pedestrian crossing;
osm.org/node/2698214222

Regards,

Daniel

Most if not all conflicts should have been resolved in osm.org/changeset/115445519
Sorry for any inconvenience.

Hey Nycs Bedonia,

Don't map natural disaster damage, please. We usually map as it was *before* events such as these, especially just after such an event, when aid services could use the data.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey GOwin,

It is possible the following area is a cemetery.
They're usually a short distance away from a residential area and not attached to farmland etc.. Graves(or memorials) may be misinterpreted as small, undefined buildings or (industrial) activities. Actual buildings can also be present.
They're usually scattered, whereas a residential area would be more structured.
osm.org/way/1001383746
This doesn't always rule out it's a (rural) settlement though.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey arnalielsewhere,

It is possible the following area is a cemetery.
They're usually a short distance away from a residential area and not attached to farmland etc.. Graves(or memorials) may be misinterpreted as small, undefined buildings or (industrial) activities. Actual buildings can also be present.
They're usually scattered, whereas a residential area would be more structured.
osm.org/way/1012670228
This doesn't always rule out it's a (rural) settlement though.

Regards,

Daniel

Manually reverted own changes in osm.org/changeset/115168082

Hey sanchi,

A POI isn't very useful without an object type. Is this a bicycle shop, or something else?
osm.org/node/8836873795

Regards,

Daniel

Ik heb je wijziging handmatig teruggedraaid.
osm.org/changeset/115016852

Het bankje waar ik naar verwijs:
osm.org/node/7574977620

Begin een draadje op het forum. Wellicht kunnen ze je daar helpen.

Beste Robert Webbe,

Zou je wat specifieker kunnen zijn in je bronnen? Heb je gekeken op locatie (survey), is dit lokale kennis, komt dit uit bv. BAG/BGT, of een andere bron? Hou er rekening mee dat we alleen gegevens mogen gebruiken van bronnen met de goede licentie;
osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Groet,

Daniel

Hey DeBigC,

In this changeset, you removed building=yes from O'Neill Centre. O'Neill Centre seems to be applied to the building. If it only applies to part of the building, use a node.

Regards,

Daniel