osm.org/way/531503333/history
- It looks like pit/quarry, not ringfort.
- It is not on HEV or NLS maps
- It is in Loughill, not Ballyoskill like
osm.org/way/531503330

(I am aware this was one of your first changesets)

Regards,

Daniel

Hey ViktoriaU,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Make sure you follow the guidelines on adding names, especially abbreviated ones.
osm.wiki/Names
(others you added are abbreviated, but should likely not be.)

For other useful tips, see
osm.wiki/Good_practice

Also, are your changes also part of an [organised effort](osm.wiki/Organised_Editing) for 'walking data accuracy'? (just curious, eventhough it seems you are on your own)

If you have any questions about how to contribute, you can contact the (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.35708,-7.70490&zoom=9
or open a thread on the forums
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Regards,

Daniel

See also
osm.org/note/4773725

Hey GOduori,

Do not reclassify highways without proper reason, please.

This road is unlikely to be a secondary road.
- It only connects two secondary roads (and minor/private roads), not directly i.e. two residential areas.
- It was previously classified as 'unclassified', which in OpenStreetMap (OSM)-terms means
'minor road', see
osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Other roads in this area are also minor or tertiary, depending on their restrictions.
- It goes through a park, which might indicate restrictions / ownership.
- It is gated on both sides, which might indicate a possible physical barrier and restrictions / ownership.

It is not even possibly through-road.
Go to 'Edit' (this is the editor called 'iD'), and in the right sidebar click on 'Data Layers', scroll down to 'Photo Overlays'(street-level imagery) and choose Mapillary.
(there is a 'Date range' slider below)
- Destinations signed are minor; park, zoo..
(there is not clear image of all signs)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=259616369186816&focus=photo
- It is signed as prohibiting 'commercial vehicles'.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1762891911107468&focus=photo
- The maxspeed is 30 km/h
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1323198022270691&focus=photo
- Further down it is one-way single lane road
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1186875451742658&focus=photo
- then becomes a 'No through traffic' / 'cul de sac'
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=142607761165803&focus=photo
- which ends at row of bollards at both ends
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=795899111312268&focus=photo
(at this way segment
osm.org/way/1037781266/history ); though image is from 2018.
- Onto Acres road there is a stop sign, so way does not have priority.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278653290630379&focus=photo
- Also last segment is one-way road in opposite direction, without priority.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1480276479182064&focus=photo

From your changeset comment, this change was based solely on getting improper/missing result(s) from a query using overpass.
From your changeset details, it is likely you used only the Bing aerial imagery (which, though it is the best in this area, is also the standard imagery in the iD editor); this is understandable, as you are a relatively new contributor.
However, it seems not based on survey, local knowledge (which may include news article), sources available in the editor or other compatible source (not proprietary/copyright, i.e. not Google Maps), nor does it explicitly mention a proper reason for reclassifying these highways in the changeset comment.

Incorrect result by such applications is usually an error in the query, or alternatively application, not directly in the map data.

Changing map data in such way is considered 'Mapping for external application' and is prohibited by OSM guidelines;
Changing map data (usually incorrectly) for application (i.e. renderer, browser, router, validator etc.) to return results solely for personal (sometimes malicious) reasons (i.e. different use / avoiding dev. work, decorative, opiniated/political, etc.). See also
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Make sure to follow the (local) guidelines or concensus on for example tags for highways.
osm.wiki/United_Kingdom#Guidelines

Be careful when changing highways, especially reclassifications but also roads with relations (i.e. bus routes, turn restrictions). Editing these without prior knowledge, especially with the basic iD editor, might accidentally introduce errors (moving nodes, disordering or breaking relations). It is better to make such advanced changes with more experience and JOSM editor.
osm.wiki/JOSM
(Changes on larger scale should be discussed prior with the (local) community.)

Also, you should provide a proper description and reason of your changes in your changeset comment when saving (preferably for most if not all changesets), so other mappers can understand and validate your changes more easily.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

For other helpful tips, see
osm.wiki/Good_practice

If you have made any other changes which could be considered similarly incorrect, you should request them to be reverted by contacting the Data Working Group (DWG)
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

If you have any questions regarding how to contribute / map, you can contact your (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/
or start a thread on the forums
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

This changeset was fully reverted in
osm.org/changeset/166693897

Your changes visualised
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166574769

Regards,

Daniel

Done. Oversight from drawing the full fence.
osm.org/changeset/166493309
(if it had more detail would've merged the other one to keep history)

Regards,

Daniel

It might be useful to add whether it accepts certain products yes or no, as indicated by the labels on the cabinet.
osm.wiki/w/index.php?oldid=1976271#Related_facilities
(you might have to take inspiration from other tags for the keys to use)

Hei AndrisS, (angļu teksts zemāk)

Nav atļauts izmantot Google Street View vai līdzīgus avotus, kuriem ir autortiesības/īpašumtiesības, kuriem ir noteikti izmantošanas ierobežojumi vai kuri (summējot) veido datubāzi (tīmekļa vietni/sarakstu/lapu).

Skatīt šādas lapas
- osm.wiki/Google
- osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Ja citos jūsu veiktajos izmaiņu komplektos ir izmantoti šādi avoti, jums ir jāpieprasa tos atgriezt (atsaukt), sazinoties ar Datu darba grupu (DWG).
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

Turklāt pienācīgi aprakstiet veiktās izmaiņas. Tas atvieglo izmaiņu izpratni un pārbaudi.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Ja neesat pārliecināts, kuri avoti ir piemēroti, ja jums ir kādi jautājumi vai vēlaties citādi apspriest savus labojumus utt.
varat sazināties ar vietējo kopienu
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=56.94057,24.88577&zoom=5.95
(Jūsu izmaiņu kopuma informācija man norāda, ka, visticamāk, esat no Latvijas, tāpēc esmu precizējis saiti, lai tā dotos uz turieni, nevis uz Īriju).

Vai jūs varētu atbildēt uz šo komentāru, lūdzu? Tas ir tāpēc, lai citi kartētāji zinātu, ka esat to izlasījis un saprotat.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

---

It is not allowed to use Google Street View or similar sources which are copyright / proprietary, have certain usage restrictions, or (when added up) form a database(website/list/sheet).

See the following pages
- osm.wiki/Google
- osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

If any other changesets you have made are using such source, you should request them to be reverted(rolled back) by contacting the Data Working Group (DWG).
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

Also, properly describe the changes you are making. This makes it easier to understand and verify changes.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If you are unsure what sources are okay, have any questions, or want to otherwise discuss your edits etc.
you can contact the local community
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=56.94057,24.88577&zoom=5.95
(Your changeset details tell me you are likely from latvia, so I have specified the link to go there instead of Ireland)

Could you reply to this comment, please? This is so other mappers know you have read and understand it.

Regards,

Daniel

---

This changeset has been reverted in
osm.org/changeset/165990874

Ref osm.org/note/3726338

osm.org/node/8262678986
POIs sharing address with building is not always wrong (depends on local consensus) and in some cases is explicitly added to distinguish objects / locations.

Hey Michael,

Be careful when validating/editing.

osm.org/node/10801169425/history
I assume you extracted artwork node from wall. Why did you do this?
Artwork node on wall is usually okay, even if of type sculpture/statue/installation/... (which this is not)

osm.org/node/10801169424
survey point is even explicitly usually part of wall or similar.
osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point

Do not blindly trust the validator application(!)
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

If object is too close to something else then it might be better viewed with a different editor application / check if editor application has a way to do so, i.e. in iD press W for wireframe mode, or in iD/JOSM use data filters, or in 3D editor select level/layer.
If it shares a node with entrance / highway it is not always wrong, some mappers may just approach this differently.
Accepting fixes from validator blindly may also result in connecting it to different, unrelated objects.
You can always ask in changeset from contributor why they placed it so close / connected it to something else.

Regards,

Daniel

Image would be useful to confirm it is not the same as nearby public bookcase which has image suggesting it can also be used as give box.
(has labels allowing shoes, tools, hardware, discs, something??, (plants/)seeds, books)
osm.org/node/9368879792/history

Some poems can serve as a memorial, but this one seems to be more of a poem which serves as (journey-based) artwork. I would suggest using instead
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/artwork_type=poem
(note, wiki linked on this page is offline apr 26 and there have been some outages due to scrapers etc.)

Also, the name is either some word(s) of the poem (usually first line), maybe somewhere mentioned in the book they wrote about this route, or no name ( in which case noname=yes )

For your information; it is part of a route and you are welcome to look for the other plaques and create a route relation (or site type relation, if you prefer, though it is mostly not supported) which includes every plaque (without a role). This route can then have a 'url' for example
https://www.visitzuidlimburg.nl/te-doen-in-zuid-limburg/routes-in-zuid-limburg/detail/gedichtenroute/60121/
(since there seems to be no official 'website')

Hey BhavyaKhatri,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you would like to contribute to the OpenStreetMap project, there are a few ways to do so, see
osm.wiki/How_to_contribute

If you would like to contribute to the iD editor, or similar applications, please read up on the Readme, Code of Conduct and Contributing files when they are available. They can be found on the GitHub repository, for example here
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/develop/README.md#participate
Feel free to make a PR on GitHub. Make sure to describe how you got to your solution and how you know it resolves the issue properly.
You can always ask for guidance. Make sure to describe what exactly you need help with.
Please note the OpenStreetMap project is on a voluntary basis. The project maintainer may take a while to get back to you.

Contributing map data can help in understanding the project structure. If you need any help with mapping, you can contact your local community at
https://openstreetmap.community/
or start a thread on
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

When testing application issues or your PR, it is important to test them locally, not on the live server. Such data does not belong in OpenStreetMap. See
osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_(advanced)

Reverted this and earlier changesets in
osm.org/changeset/165428680

osm.org/node/9561479152/history
osm.org/node/9561479151/history
Those seem to be pillars in wall with gates, no bollards visible on Mapillary 2018.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=811089846457031&focus=photo

osm.org/way/729909317/history
Dat is wel een kort segment met motor_vehicle=no, emergency=yes.
Pas verderop staat een access_sign node.
Ik verwacht de access-restrictie pas na de access_sign, behalve als de locatie van het toegangsbord is veranderd.

Horse farm here is maybe the one to the north

Another example, clearly horse farm
osm.org/way/754389072

Ok, I see, this is building part. Needs resurveying / changing building outline if it is already finished construction.
osm.org/way/1346668756

osm.org/node/12455844550/history
seems at wrong location based on old Mapillary / Bing Streetside it is on the small building on the corner to the north
osm.org/way/1184249013

It might also be useful to add dog=leashed to the segment between the two gates.

osm.org/node/12456276754/history
Seems at wrong location. Use instead
https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=ffd55464-feae-4de2-9286-1bb5d1ed371d&focus=pic
sequence is more dense..

Ref osm.org/note/679392

These are likely shelters/roofs for horses or similar?
They do not look like huts (or as Victor suggests, shooting cabins)