danieldegroot2's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
116340016 | over 3 years ago | No problem. Some location information can be derived from other data, but address tags are always useful to have. The node you mentioned could use the addr:housenumber tag, though if you're not sure what the housenumber is you can skip it. |
116355820 | over 3 years ago | Hey Anne, The tactile_paving tag does not apply to traffic signals. It only applies to i.e. footways and highway=crossing nodes (where i.e. footway=crossing and the road meet). Compare;
for pedestrians, when mapped seperately
for cars, which is always mapped seperately from crossings(!)
Be sure to zoom in enough to see which one your tagging. Regards, Daniel |
108516862 | over 3 years ago | Are you sure Templedowney Church of Ireland is on Main Street? (preferably the postal address)
Regardless, I think it's a good idea to add its wikidata;
Let me know. Regards, Daniel |
116340016 | over 3 years ago | Hey Peer van Daalen, It seems you added place:suburb instead of addr:suburb by accident. Regards, Daniel |
116338065 | over 3 years ago | Hey TXPeig, "<object x> update <version number>" does not describe the changes you've made in a changeset. Please use good changeset comments, see the page below;
In addition, I would appreciate it if you replied to this changeset comment so I know you've seen it. Regards, Daniel |
116321054 | over 3 years ago | Hey Victor, I would suggest using
osm.wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_links Is there a reason you used "related" instead? Regards, Daniel |
116337888 | over 3 years ago | Hey egmont, Your cliffs seem to be pointing upslope. As you have almost 31k changesets, I'm sure you are aware there are multiple aerial imagery layers available in the editor; see
I would recommend checking other imagery layers to find how to map the cliffs. Bing does not show height differences well.
We do usually not map herders paths, dry water flow over flat bedrock plateaus, archeological sites or similar. Paths and waterways have to be physically present (at least clearly visible; signed is also helpful) to be mapped. Read the following page on good practice, please.
The archeological sites you have mapped are mostly holes rather than hills in the landscape and othwerwise are also unverifiable. If you continue to map like this it may be considered vandalism. Regards, Daniel |
93386121 | over 3 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message. Kind regards, Daniel On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community. |
30907938 | over 3 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message. Kind regards, Daniel On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community. |
98466742 | over 3 years ago | Reverted the removal of the building tag in
|
98466742 | over 3 years ago | For the building=* tag I'd use =yes, as I don't see a good value for it. I think social facility covers it better than community centre as it's focused on (health) services rather than activities (see McGrath center). It's possible to tag amenity=social_facility with social_facility=day_care for the day services.
The therapy services can be indicated with the healthcare / healthcare:speciality keys
Could you add the building tag, please? You can always add other tags such as the ones above later if needed. (I read on their Facebook a specialised pre-school function is also included, but while it overlaps with amenity=kindergarten I think it's better to leave it like this.) |
98466742 | over 3 years ago | If there are no outdoor areas, the tags are applied to the building.
If the amenity shares a boundary with a building, *both* features are mapped on a single area element.
This means building=yes should be retained. An exception would be i.e. amenity=shelter, which does not need e.g. building=roof as it's not much of a building. |
115440845 | over 3 years ago | Hey Anne, I see you tagged a number nodes, such as osm.org/node/9370874597/history
Regards, Daniel |
115445285 | over 3 years ago | Most if not all conflicts should have been resolved in osm.org/changeset/115445519
|
114972446 | over 3 years ago | Hey Nycs Bedonia, Don't map natural disaster damage, please. We usually map as it was *before* events such as these, especially just after such an event, when aid services could use the data. Regards, Daniel |
113645386 | over 3 years ago | Hey GOwin, It is possible the following area is a cemetery.
Regards, Daniel |
114990863 | over 3 years ago | Hey arnalielsewhere, It is possible the following area is a cemetery.
Regards, Daniel |
115141788 | over 3 years ago | Manually reverted own changes in osm.org/changeset/115168082 |
106421846 | over 3 years ago | Hey sanchi, A POI isn't very useful without an object type. Is this a bicycle shop, or something else?
Regards, Daniel |
114883592 | over 3 years ago | Ik heb je wijziging handmatig teruggedraaid.
|