Hey Vincent,

It looks like this is underneath a roof, so I've added it as a building part.
osm.org/changeset/125919671

If the defibrillator is located on/in the wall, you may choose to move it onto the building part way.
Regardless, it would be good to add the defibrillator:location to describe this.

Regards,

Daniel

(hospital did not have a name, sorry)

Was it open this time, or not?
You could add prefix proposed:

Note, anything with access=no already has everything as "no". Instead, use an exception

(emergency vehicle example);
access=no
emergency=yes

horses then;
access=no
horse=yes

However, this seems to be a private training track, so this isn't needed.
osm.org/changeset/125325272

( sport=equestrian is not
sport=horse_racing )

Changes:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125325272

Regards,

Daniel

Hey docyeti,

I would like to remind you to use good changeset comments.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

It is okay if these comments are in German, although they should preferably be in English when editing in ie. USA. Try using
https://www.deepl.com/

Please reply to this comment, so other mappers know you have read it.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey osmfd,

Multiple objects in this changeset were simply squared without any quality checks. This meant
- completely changed geometry for
osm.org/way/46606575
which was corrected in
osm.org/changeset/122592878

- redundant nodes for
osm.org/way/818763372
osm.org/changeset/125289159
which I've since corrected..

- ( Inaccurate building geometry for
osm.org/way/1038887387 ); the southwestern corner looks to be a 'backyard'.

Also, this changeset is way too large. It covers the entirety of Ireland, which makes it hard to check what you are doing.
MapRoulette tasks are meant to be done one by one. I can see you did not do this and did not submit the tasks back to MapRoulette after completing them.

Regards,

Daniel

(has since been retagged stile=stepover)
No problem, it's just fyi. Feel free to add the step_count if possible.
"wall" and "fence" were added before types were documented (and may still be added by new users).

What does the stile look like?

Hey paul,

Was the defibrillator located in the wall, on the wall, or elsewhere?
You can add this to the location (in both languages).

In addition, you may add "support"
osm.wiki/Key:support

Regards,

Daniel

Dat wordt nog wat met die bomen :-)

The housenumber of this building is already specified. I would suggest removing it, or adding POI details.

Hey c2r,

osm.org/node/9754868496

This is a throwline (/ lifeline).
When inside a bag, it's a throwbag. If the pot is attached to the rope we'll have to introduce a new value "throwpot", maybe. ;-)

It can be tagged with
emergency=rescue_equipment
rescue_equipment=*
(* being whatever value you like)

Regards,

Daniel

Hola Alvarado2510

¿Cómo sabes que estos ríos y picos tienen estos nombres exactos? Supongo que sus ubicaciones no se mencionan en el mismo documento. No se pueden añadir estos nombres -y por tanto los límites- a un río o pico concreto sin una fuente adecuada. Es decir, no podemos utilizar Bing Maps o el propio navegador Bing para los nombres, su licencia sólo permite el uso de las imágenes de satélite puestas a disposición de los editores de OSM (iD/JOSM/..).
osm.wiki/Bing_Maps#Terms,_Clarifications
Entonces, ¿cuál es su fuente para asignar estos picos y ríos específicos con estos nombres? O, ¿el mismo documento describe sus ubicaciones en algún lugar?

Si has hecho ediciones utilizando esas fuentes, deberías ponerte en contacto con el DWG. Ellos pueden revertir estas ediciones por ti, o bloquearte hasta que puedas demostrar que no usarás estas fuentes. Puedes encontrarlos aquí:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group

También, por favor, responde a este comentario sobre el conjunto de cambios. Así sabremos que lo has leído.

Saludos,

Daniel

Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor www.DeepL.com/Translator

---
(Original message);

Hey Alvarado2510,

How do you know these rivers and peaks have these exact names? I assume their locations are not mentioned in the same document. You can not add these names -and therefore the boundaries- to a specific river or peak without a proper source. I.e. We can not use Bing Maps or the Bing browser itself for names, its license only permits the use of the satelite imagery made available to OSM editors (iD/JOSM/..).
osm.wiki/Bing_Maps#Terms,_Clarifications
So, what is your source for assigning these specific peaks and rivers with these names? Or, does the same document describe their locations anywhere?

If you have made edits using such sources, you should contact the DWG. They can revert these edits for you, or block you until you can show that you will not use these sources. You can find them here:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group

Also, please reply to this changeset comment. This way we know you have read it.

Regards,

Daniel

Beste wag320n,

Vanuit deze bewerking lijkt het zeer waarschijnlijk dat deze gegevens direct zijn gekopieerd vanuit Google. Deze en andere private/door auteursrecht beschermde bronnen zijn niet toegestaan voor gebruik in OSM.
osm.wiki/Google
De Data werkgroep kan al deze bewerkingen voor je terugdraaien en je een frisse start geven, of als je dit niet doet je te blokkeren totdat je kunt laten zien dit niet meer te doen.
Voor contactinformatie kun je hier terecht:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group

We waarderen een antwoord op deze reactie, zodat we weten dat je 'm leest.

Groet,

Daniel

Volledig ongedaan gemaakt, zie
osm.org/changeset/124633617

- Kijk uit met schuiven, je verplaatst hierbij al snel adressen..
- De helft ongedaan maken en aan de rest niets aanpassen helpt hier niet. Het beste is om overnieuw te beginnen in kleine changesets.
- Weet je zeker dat deze winkels een fysieke locatie hebben die je kunt bezoeken? Zo ja, dan kun je ze toevoegen met de normale, beborde naam ipv de website URL.
Winkels met slechts online webshops behoren niet in OSM (behalve sommige dark stores dan)
- Een gebouw in opbouw is building=construction
(niet building=yes + construction=yes)
osm.org/way/743201459
Merk op dat we de gebouwen en adressen uit de BAG importeren. Updates kunnen het best op het forum aangevraagd worden.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Groet,

Daniel

@mariotomo For their contact details, see
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=14.71801,121.21258&zoom=9.58

@mariotomo You can find the involved YouthMapper chapters and author on the project's page, which in this case is also directly linked under "host" in the changeset details.
https://tasks.teachosm.org/projects/1332

(Browse the internet for contact details if needed.)

@mariotomo This was a project anyone could edit -not lead by youthmappers- and has since been archived.
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/7260

This user has not made any edits since.

You can still discuss this project on the HOT mailing list if needed.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Hey joeyctatu,

Use good changeset comments, please. See
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

This changeset was manually reverted by another tomtom user and subsequently directly reverted by
osm.org/changeset/124501444