Emblemo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

bildsimbolo de retpoŝto bildsimbolo de Bluesky bildsimbolo de Facebook bildsimbolo de LinkedIn bildsimbolo de Mastodon bildsimbolo de Telegram bildsimbolo de X

Diskuto

Komento de andrewpmk je 18 majo 2009 je 12:32

Presumably they mean cycleways?

Komento de Harry Wood je 18 majo 2009 je 12:43

I guess this means they'll be adding some footways to their actual maps too. Can't believe they'd throw enough manpower at the problem to achieve a decent level of coverage though.

Komento de Richard je 18 majo 2009 je 20:08

It's just a PR gimmick (cynic, moi?) aimed at getting some pretty views in there - "honeypots" as they're called in the tourist trade.

The story says that they'll be using it for "castles, coastal paths, natural wonders, historic buildings [or] monuments and stadiums". Coastal paths are a non-starter - I'd like to see the Google trike on the Pembrokeshire Coast Path. No, really, I would. I wouldn't want to be the one who called the Coastguard after it fell off the cliff edge though.

The rest (except for "natural wonders", which could mean anything) are all private property. So access for trikes is entirely at the say-so of the landowner - who will be no doubt delighted with the publicity!

Komento de daveemtb je 18 majo 2009 je 20:42

Let's all vote for the coastal paths for a laugh, eh? ;)

Ensaluti por aldoni komenton