OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2009년 5월 18일 12:32andrewpmk님의 의견

Presumably they mean cycleways?

2009년 5월 18일 12:43Harry Wood님의 의견

I guess this means they'll be adding some footways to their actual maps too. Can't believe they'd throw enough manpower at the problem to achieve a decent level of coverage though.

2009년 5월 18일 20:08Richard님의 의견

It's just a PR gimmick (cynic, moi?) aimed at getting some pretty views in there - "honeypots" as they're called in the tourist trade.

The story says that they'll be using it for "castles, coastal paths, natural wonders, historic buildings [or] monuments and stadiums". Coastal paths are a non-starter - I'd like to see the Google trike on the Pembrokeshire Coast Path. No, really, I would. I wouldn't want to be the one who called the Coastguard after it fell off the cliff edge though.

The rest (except for "natural wonders", which could mean anything) are all private property. So access for trikes is entirely at the say-so of the landowner - who will be no doubt delighted with the publicity!

2009년 5월 18일 20:42daveemtb님의 의견

Let's all vote for the coastal paths for a laugh, eh? ;)

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요