hoserab's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
161582000 | 7 months ago | I presume you're the same user as osm.org/user/Leonard%20Cohen, who left this note: osm.org/note/4586974? FYI see osm.org/changeset/161585445, I fixed a bunch of things you had changed in this and all your preceding edits. |
161585445 | 7 months ago | full disclosure: I made these changes to address osm.org/note/4586974, and to rectify changesets by the user osm.org/user/Leonard%20E%20Cohen: 161581549, 161581617, 161581633, 161581658, 161581690, 161581706, 161581747, 161581805, 161581843, 161581859, 161581886, 161581936, 161581955, 161582000 |
161258431 | 7 months ago | Oops, fat finger; my bad. Thanks for fixing! |
159340047 | 9 months ago | *geometries (Me fail English? That's unpossible!) |
159102661 | 9 months ago | Hi henreemash, Please note that you do not need to append the names of bus routes with their route number. That's what the `ref=*` key is for. Adding "304" to the name of the Max Yellow routes is totally superfluous. That goes for any and all bus routes. I don't want to dissuade you from contributing to the map, just trying to warn you that these sorts of edits aren't correct. Thanks for your contributions! |
158782827 | 10 months ago | Why did you delete the Inuktitut and French names from Devon Island and Baillie-Hamilton Island? Especially the Inuktitut, given about 90% of Nunavummiut speak Inuit languages...? |
158601301 | 10 months ago | I've re-added the chess board, see osm.org/changeset/158682968. Please don't delete it again. |
158601301 | 10 months ago | Uh, excuse me: yes there frickin' is a a giant chess board there. >:( |
158261707 | 10 months ago | You had already added this supermarket, osm.org/node/12101056439; osm.org/changeset/155031279 I have since deleted this node. |
158435933 | 10 months ago | I should be clear: I replaced the "service:vehicle:a/c_recharge=yes" tag with "service:vehicle:air_conditioning=yes" so that there's no confusion about this fixme note again. |
158397705 | 10 months ago | Also added detail to the parking lot/alley in behind the old library & Police Admin buildings. |
158229154 | 10 months ago | *Prince's Island Estates, not Eau Claire Estates (to-may-to, to-mah-to...) |
156261727 | 10 months ago | Thanks for adding these, Minh. :) I don't know speak Chinese (or any other language that may historically/incidentally use Han characters), so wasn't very confident about adding the names in Chinese. (Whereas e.g. osm.org/changeset/128536413 I had public online sources from the City of Calgary to simply copy-paste the characters from.) |
157602267 | 10 months ago | Hi Andrew, You seem to have pulled these nodes:
... in Toronto all out of whack. Seems unrelated to your changes in Calgary. I've since tried my best to fix it. (see osm.org/changeset/157683486) |
157562463 | 10 months ago | Hi Andrew, FYI the road ways you added in this change seem to have been duplicates of existing ones already on the map. I presume you were trying to fix the connectivity of the #9 Dalhousie bus route, and JOSM mistakenly generated new ways rather than adding the existing ones to the relation. I've since fixed it. (See osm.org/changeset/157593048) Just wanted to let you know, to keep a lookout as you continue to make sure it's not adding copies of road ways on top of existing ones. Thanks! |
157261670 | 11 months ago | :/ You should have fixing the tagging here, rather than deleted the alley. I have since re-added it. Please be more careful in future. |
155886237 | 12 months ago | Hi Callem, Please note that the roads you changed the access tagging to were already tagged `access=no`. This means that public access is strictly prohibited, so you really didn't need to change this. Please see osm.wiki/Key:access. Thanks! |
155438664 | 12 months ago | "disused:shop=yes" seems like a silly tag to use here, it's a disused architect's office space on the top floor of a historic building. |
154993147 | about 1 year ago | Sorry, change leisure=park, not *landuse*. Anyway... |
154944722 | about 1 year ago | I know there's a warning here for using the barrier=block tags on two line ways in lieu of node points, but I don't know of any better tagging to use in such a situation. In reality what's there is two courses of these types of interlocking concrete blocks: https://concrete-security-barriers.co.uk/lg-interlocking-concrete-barrier/ ... plus a metal fence on top of it. The fence and the blocks are partially contiguous, but not entirely, which is why I mapped them as separate ways. If someone has a better idea of what to do, feel free to change it! |