OpenStreetMap-logo OpenStreetMap

E-mail-ikon Bluesky-ikon Facebook-ikon LinkedIn-ikon Mastodon-ikon Telegram-ikon X-ikon

Diskussion

Kommentar fra Tom Chance skrevet 11. maj 2009 kl. 08:54

I'm glad to see someone picking up the St Albans mantle! It would be good to fill in the landuse areas in The Camp area where I started, hint hint ;-)

Kommentar fra ianc skrevet 11. maj 2009 kl. 12:38

I'm pretty much planning on working around the place. New Greens et al has the great advantage being outside my window tho'...

Any idea why Beech Bottom Dyke has stopped displaying on the live map?

Kommentar fra Tom Chance skrevet 11. maj 2009 kl. 14:15

The archaelogical site? It doesn't appear to be in the Mapnik stylesheet:

http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik/osm.xml

You could add a request to trac.openstreetmap.org with a suggestion of how it could look. I guess they might also be clamping down on names for areas that don't have a specific style rule, but mention the fact that the name has disappeared in the trac ticket.

Kommentar fra ianc skrevet 11. maj 2009 kl. 15:06

Hmmm. I rather assumed that if it was in a preset and on a pick-list it would be valid...

Kommentar fra Tom Chance skrevet 11. maj 2009 kl. 19:15

Afraid not! All of the various tools are maintained by different people, and the map layers on the OSM front page are treated as sensible default views on a database that contains tonnes of other data. The mapnik stylesheet is maintained by Steve Chilton, who is a pretty experienced cartographer.

Kommentar fra ianc skrevet 12. maj 2009 kl. 15:00

Hmmm. That just seems barking mad to me - hard to imagine a better recipe for confusion.

Log ind for at kommentere