Logo di OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Coment di Tom Chance ai 11 di May 2009 a lis 08:54

I'm glad to see someone picking up the St Albans mantle! It would be good to fill in the landuse areas in The Camp area where I started, hint hint ;-)

Coment di ianc ai 11 di May 2009 a lis 12:38

I'm pretty much planning on working around the place. New Greens et al has the great advantage being outside my window tho'...

Any idea why Beech Bottom Dyke has stopped displaying on the live map?

Coment di Tom Chance ai 11 di May 2009 a lis 14:15

The archaelogical site? It doesn't appear to be in the Mapnik stylesheet:

http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik/osm.xml

You could add a request to trac.openstreetmap.org with a suggestion of how it could look. I guess they might also be clamping down on names for areas that don't have a specific style rule, but mention the fact that the name has disappeared in the trac ticket.

Coment di ianc ai 11 di May 2009 a lis 15:06

Hmmm. I rather assumed that if it was in a preset and on a pick-list it would be valid...

Coment di Tom Chance ai 11 di May 2009 a lis 19:15

Afraid not! All of the various tools are maintained by different people, and the map layers on the OSM front page are treated as sensible default views on a database that contains tonnes of other data. The mapnik stylesheet is maintained by Steve Chilton, who is a pretty experienced cartographer.

Coment di ianc ai 12 di May 2009 a lis 15:00

Hmmm. That just seems barking mad to me - hard to imagine a better recipe for confusion.

Jentre par lassâ un coment