Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Ícono de correo electrónico Icono de Bluesky Ícono de Facebook Ícono de LinkedIn Ícono de Mastodon Ícono de Telegram Ícono X

Discusión

Comentario de Tom Chance el 11 de mayo de 2009 a las 08:54

I'm glad to see someone picking up the St Albans mantle! It would be good to fill in the landuse areas in The Camp area where I started, hint hint ;-)

Comentario de ianc el 11 de mayo de 2009 a las 12:38

I'm pretty much planning on working around the place. New Greens et al has the great advantage being outside my window tho'...

Any idea why Beech Bottom Dyke has stopped displaying on the live map?

Comentario de Tom Chance el 11 de mayo de 2009 a las 14:15

The archaelogical site? It doesn't appear to be in the Mapnik stylesheet:

http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik/osm.xml

You could add a request to trac.openstreetmap.org with a suggestion of how it could look. I guess they might also be clamping down on names for areas that don't have a specific style rule, but mention the fact that the name has disappeared in the trac ticket.

Comentario de ianc el 11 de mayo de 2009 a las 15:06

Hmmm. I rather assumed that if it was in a preset and on a pick-list it would be valid...

Comentario de Tom Chance el 11 de mayo de 2009 a las 19:15

Afraid not! All of the various tools are maintained by different people, and the map layers on the OSM front page are treated as sensible default views on a database that contains tonnes of other data. The mapnik stylesheet is maintained by Steve Chilton, who is a pretty experienced cartographer.

Comentario de ianc el 12 de mayo de 2009 a las 15:00

Hmmm. That just seems barking mad to me - hard to imagine a better recipe for confusion.

Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario