Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Gruppo de modificationes Quando Commento
54505486 plus de 4 annos retro

It is Sharpless Road

79205665 plus de 5 annos retro

Thank you!

76861170 plus de 5 annos retro

Just seems to be some oddities in the iD editors presets. Fixed now

58155989 plus de 6 annos retro

Oops, It's fixed now.

63750028 plus de 6 annos retro

It should be imported sometime this month, We are finalising the plan right now.

63775894 quasi 7 annos retro

Also don't worry about the destroyed data, I bought it back.

63775894 quasi 7 annos retro

I started removing on the 16th Oct 2018.

63775894 quasi 7 annos retro

I haven't removed all. But If you would like to revert then I would have no real problem, I think I may have destroyed some surveyed stuff not in the PSMA.

Be super careful reverting though since I may have mapped streams and other stuff.

63775894 quasi 7 annos retro

I do believe that QLD is the most ready for the import. But yes we don't currently have date.

Here is the planning osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries

Do you want me to revert the changeset?

23811453 quasi 7 annos retro

digitalglobe premium shows the construction area as completed, do you know if this is true?

56910428 plus de 7 annos retro

Moggill Road Exit and Cedarleigh Road Exit. Make no sense given that they are sliproads that merge onto said road. Even if you did get it from the official government data. I'm going to take away the "Exit" since there is no sign saying this on the ground anyways.

56647196 plus de 7 annos retro

Just be warned that the area you made is actually a building. The only way to make an area around a group of apartments is to make a residential area, like you would to houses.

43368714 plus de 7 annos retro

Is this really a military zone?

56254068 plus de 7 annos retro

The only problem it could cause is if you didn't carry over any metadata from the old object, Things like addresses could get deleted with it. In iD editor scroll to the bottom of the left sidebar of the object, and under all tags just make sure those get transferred.

56254068 plus de 7 annos retro

Hi, I just noticed that this edit deleted a few things and then re-added them. Was this justified? A good rule is to keep history, only deleting objects which really need to be deleted.

55674075 plus de 7 annos retro

It's a shame it had to go, If you're on the au mailing list you may see that I'm trying to get permission for such a dataset.

55674075 plus de 7 annos retro

OK, I've seen.

55674075 plus de 7 annos retro

That's a lot of nodes removed. What were you doing exactly? (out of interest)

55674105 plus de 7 annos retro

Did the same for this one as the last

55674149 plus de 7 annos retro

That's fair. But just remember addresses can be made into a single point, so as to be preserved when they are demo'd.

I've bought back the addresses only. Make sure to keep this in mind in the future, as to not destroy data.