OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset Kad Komentārs
54505486 over 4 years ago

It is Sharpless Road

79205665 over 5 years ago

Thank you!

76861170 over 5 years ago

Just seems to be some oddities in the iD editors presets. Fixed now

58155989 over 6 years ago

Oops, It's fixed now.

63750028 over 6 years ago

It should be imported sometime this month, We are finalising the plan right now.

63775894 almost 7 years ago

Also don't worry about the destroyed data, I bought it back.

63775894 almost 7 years ago

I started removing on the 16th Oct 2018.

63775894 almost 7 years ago

I haven't removed all. But If you would like to revert then I would have no real problem, I think I may have destroyed some surveyed stuff not in the PSMA.

Be super careful reverting though since I may have mapped streams and other stuff.

63775894 almost 7 years ago

I do believe that QLD is the most ready for the import. But yes we don't currently have date.

Here is the planning osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries

Do you want me to revert the changeset?

23811453 almost 7 years ago

digitalglobe premium shows the construction area as completed, do you know if this is true?

56910428 over 7 years ago

Moggill Road Exit and Cedarleigh Road Exit. Make no sense given that they are sliproads that merge onto said road. Even if you did get it from the official government data. I'm going to take away the "Exit" since there is no sign saying this on the ground anyways.

56647196 over 7 years ago

Just be warned that the area you made is actually a building. The only way to make an area around a group of apartments is to make a residential area, like you would to houses.

43368714 over 7 years ago

Is this really a military zone?

56254068 over 7 years ago

The only problem it could cause is if you didn't carry over any metadata from the old object, Things like addresses could get deleted with it. In iD editor scroll to the bottom of the left sidebar of the object, and under all tags just make sure those get transferred.

56254068 over 7 years ago

Hi, I just noticed that this edit deleted a few things and then re-added them. Was this justified? A good rule is to keep history, only deleting objects which really need to be deleted.

55674075 over 7 years ago

It's a shame it had to go, If you're on the au mailing list you may see that I'm trying to get permission for such a dataset.

55674075 over 7 years ago

OK, I've seen.

55674075 over 7 years ago

That's a lot of nodes removed. What were you doing exactly? (out of interest)

55674105 over 7 years ago

Did the same for this one as the last

55674149 over 7 years ago

That's fair. But just remember addresses can be made into a single point, so as to be preserved when they are demo'd.

I've bought back the addresses only. Make sure to keep this in mind in the future, as to not destroy data.