OpenStreetMap-ის ლოგო OpenStreetMap

Changeset როდის კომენტარი
116587265 over 3 years ago

Thanks for letting me know.

107493697 over 3 years ago

Hi, in this changeset I only delete tag building=yes.
I guess this can be a typo, osm ID says: craft=gardening is a place producing or processing customized goods

114103245 over 3 years ago

I got the idea to use the place = square tag there. but it's too late))

114103245 over 3 years ago

ok then i revert the changeset.
Thanks for paying attention to this.

114103245 over 3 years ago

yes, I see parking spaces around the church. What do you think is better to return highway = living_street or add parking spaces?

114103245 over 3 years ago

Hello Larmax.
I have not deleted roads with highway = living_street tag.
but I decided to mark the territory as highway = pedestrian because this road can be mapped by a polygon and shows that there is a priority for pedestrians. but if I'm wrong, then I will return everything to its place of course.

112112383 almost 4 years ago

Hello Gscholz,
I apologize for my omission and thank you for correcting me. I will try to be more attentive with Relation:boundary.

112123926 almost 4 years ago

Hello Lee Carré.
I have taken note of your comments. I will try not to make such gross and rookie mistakes in the future.

112123926 almost 4 years ago

Hello Lee Carré.
My bad is that I upload such a big size changeset.

osm.wiki/Names - Name is the name only. So ill try to fix the spam "q" "s / n" "I" from name tag.

The description what i move is:
osm.org/way/972434504/history
In this case I'll think after @ 4004 comment that I can move it into description.

Maxar imagery and Mapbox Satellite help me with this edit
osm.org/way/989908342/history

Again, thanks to your comments, I realized that I cannot upload such big edits cause it's hard to validate changesets and contradicts osm wiki recommendations.
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

If you need more information about this changeset you can write to me in DM and i will help you with that.

112123926 almost 4 years ago

Hello 4004.
I revised the changeset again, all useful information I moved it to the description

112123926 almost 4 years ago

Hello Markus.
Yes, we already talk about this with Andy. i will not upload such a big geographical size changeset in the future.

112123926 almost 4 years ago

yeah, sure, I will write him in DM if I see an active mapper who has such mistakes

112123926 almost 4 years ago

Hello, here some links for examples:
osm.org/way/863486818/history
osm.org/way/973380481/history
osm.org/way/834535442/history
osm.org/way/817480463/history

If you want more examples, they in ways history on this changesets. Or you can text me in direct messages and i will show you more examples. once again I apologize for upload such a big geographical size changeset.

112123926 almost 4 years ago

yes, my mistake, there were just a lot of small and insignificant spam in names...next time will separate changes

99626158 almost 4 years ago

Hello ZeLonewolf thanks for improvement osm data, but in this changeset u made a mistake by merge wrong nodes

103417842 about 4 years ago

Thank you for your attention. I changed the geometry, I found new photos of these buildings in your link and some new ones photos.
But on this photos didn't see the new roads, would be nice if u will drew it around this building if they was changed - i guess they did cause on new photos i see new crossroads.

Now i know who i can contract about Askim area.

104298461 over 4 years ago

Hello my friend, I changed tag=building to landuse=construction because it is not correct to use building=construction for such a big area around the building.
We have old satellite imagery (Jul 25, 2014) where we can see the school building, and we have Maxar Premium Imagery where school building already was demolished.
Also we have April 2020 articles on the internet from about the demolition of the old school building

102588864 over 4 years ago

Добрый день, убрал название тратура и убрал юр. доступы т.к. знаков там нет. остальные правки коректны.