OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

New MapRoulette Challenge: Crossing Ways

mvexel님이 English로 2014년 6월 30일에 게시함. 최근 2014년 7월 1일에 업데이트됨.

We created a new MapRoulette challenge over at Telenav: Crossing Ways. As always with the Telenav-generated challenges, this one is US only, because we currently only process OpenStreetMap data for the United States. We are working on extending support for other regions.

TL;DR –> On to MapRoulette!!

The Crossing Ways challenge is pretty straightforward and should make for an easy challenge for novice mappers looking for something to fix. It detects ways that cross, but neither way is tagged as a bridge or tunnel. Here is an example:

Example from MapRoulette

If you open this up in iD or JOSM, you will be able to tell the required resolution from the aerial imagery:

in JOSM

In this case, the ways should be connected as there is clearly an intersection. Another possibility is that there actually should be a bridge or tunnel tag on either of the ways.

In this particular case, you can see that there actually is a node at the intersection, but it does not connect both ways. In JOSM, it displays as a ‘skinny node’:

Skinny node in JOSM.

In this case, you can use JOSM’s ‘Join’ function (shortcut ‘J’) to connect both ways. In iD, a node connecting two ways will be grey, and a regular node will be white:

Nodes in iD

If you use iD, you can just drag an existing node to the intersection to snap the two ways together, or drag a virtual node to the intersection to create a new intersection node. (Virtual nodes appear between two existing nodes and allow you to quickly create a new node on a way, an example shown below.)

virtual node in iD

There are currently around 19,000 cases in the US alone, so let’s get on fixing these annoying bugs in OSM!

On to MapRoulette!

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2014년 6월 30일 17:01todrobbins님의 의견

Great work mvexel!

2014년 6월 30일 17:27jumbanho님의 의견

Does this work for cycle/foot- ways, paths and tracks, too?

2014년 6월 30일 18:18mvexel님의 의견

jumbanho - those are excluded for now, but it’s a good idea for a followup challenge.

2014년 7월 1일 01:01Alan님의 의견

I think the URL in your last link “On to MapRoulette” is broken. Needs the http:, I think.

2014년 7월 1일 03:08mvexel님의 의견

Thanks @Alan, fixing…

2014년 7월 1일 06:08AndiG88님의 의견

I think http://keepright.at/ also displays those, if you want to fix them outside the US.

2014년 7월 1일 13:11Pieren님의 의견

I’m assigned to this “challenge”: http://openstreetmap.us/iD/release/#id=w157598950&map=18.72/-122.27129/47.50951

What is wrong here ? is it possible that “bridge=viaduct” is not recognized by the QA tool ?

2014년 7월 1일 14:51mvexel님의 의견

Pieren: You have discovered a bug. bridge=viaduct was not processed and will appear as false positives. We are working on a fix! This is less than 1% of bridges in the US, most are just bridge=yes. We discovered another bug where we did not recognize _link ways that are also tagged as bridge (or tunnel). This is also being fixed.

Thanks for reporting!

2014년 7월 1일 14:53mvexel님의 의견

AndiG88 - correct. I still want to get closer collaboration with KeepRight, and have been in touch with the author before, but due to a lack of time on my part, I haven’t been able to follow up.

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요