اوپن سٹریٹ میپ دا لوگو اوپن سٹریٹ میپ

New MapRoulette Challenge: Crossing Ways

ایہہ ؜30؍؜June ؜2014ء‬ English وچ «mvexel» لیکھ چھپیا گیا سی۔ ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء‬ تے پہلا نواں کرن

We created a new MapRoulette challenge over at Telenav: Crossing Ways. As always with the Telenav-generated challenges, this one is US only, because we currently only process OpenStreetMap data for the United States. We are working on extending support for other regions.

TL;DR –> On to MapRoulette!!

The Crossing Ways challenge is pretty straightforward and should make for an easy challenge for novice mappers looking for something to fix. It detects ways that cross, but neither way is tagged as a bridge or tunnel. Here is an example:

Example from MapRoulette

If you open this up in iD or JOSM, you will be able to tell the required resolution from the aerial imagery:

in JOSM

In this case, the ways should be connected as there is clearly an intersection. Another possibility is that there actually should be a bridge or tunnel tag on either of the ways.

In this particular case, you can see that there actually is a node at the intersection, but it does not connect both ways. In JOSM, it displays as a ‘skinny node’:

Skinny node in JOSM.

In this case, you can use JOSM’s ‘Join’ function (shortcut ‘J’) to connect both ways. In iD, a node connecting two ways will be grey, and a regular node will be white:

Nodes in iD

If you use iD, you can just drag an existing node to the intersection to snap the two ways together, or drag a virtual node to the intersection to create a new intersection node. (Virtual nodes appear between two existing nodes and allow you to quickly create a new node on a way, an example shown below.)

virtual node in iD

There are currently around 19,000 cases in the US alone, so let’s get on fixing these annoying bugs in OSM!

On to MapRoulette!

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

ایہہ ؜30؍؜June ؜2014ء ‪17:01‬ تے «todrobbins» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

Great work mvexel!

ایہہ ؜30؍؜June ؜2014ء ‪17:27‬ تے «jumbanho» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

Does this work for cycle/foot- ways, paths and tracks, too?

ایہہ ؜30؍؜June ؜2014ء ‪18:18‬ تے «mvexel» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

jumbanho - those are excluded for now, but it’s a good idea for a followup challenge.

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪01:01‬ تے «Alan» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

I think the URL in your last link “On to MapRoulette” is broken. Needs the http:, I think.

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪03:08‬ تے «mvexel» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

Thanks @Alan, fixing…

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪06:08‬ تے «AndiG88» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

I think http://keepright.at/ also displays those, if you want to fix them outside the US.

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪13:11‬ تے «Pieren» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

I’m assigned to this “challenge”: http://openstreetmap.us/iD/release/#id=w157598950&map=18.72/-122.27129/47.50951

What is wrong here ? is it possible that “bridge=viaduct” is not recognized by the QA tool ?

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪14:51‬ تے «mvexel» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

Pieren: You have discovered a bug. bridge=viaduct was not processed and will appear as false positives. We are working on a fix! This is less than 1% of bridges in the US, most are just bridge=yes. We discovered another bug where we did not recognize _link ways that are also tagged as bridge (or tunnel). This is also being fixed.

Thanks for reporting!

ایہہ ؜ 1؍؜July ؜2014ء ‪14:53‬ تے «mvexel» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔

AndiG88 - correct. I still want to get closer collaboration with KeepRight, and have been in touch with the author before, but due to a lack of time on my part, I haven’t been able to follow up.

ٹپݨی چھڈݨ واسطے لوگ‌این کرو