Hi, it's not clear what this memorial is--I can't see anything in imagery and don't find any mention of it online. Can you give some clarification about it or a source? Thanks

I see that you've added local_ref to some of the bus stops, but it seems like you're using it incorrectly. According to the wiki (osm.wiki/Key:local_ref) local_ref should be used to tag one platform within a station. You are using it for the bus route numbers, which are already present in the route_ref tag.

Hi, I'm wondering why you changed the Union Depot relation from type=site to type=building? It clearly includes many features that are in addition to the building, not to mention the main building itself has its own relation (6894450). The wiki page on site relation may be a helpful reference: osm.wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site

Hi, thanks for putting in the effort to trace these buildings of the old Ford Plant. However, these have all been demolished (thus the brownfield landuse surrounding the site) and it'd be great if you could remove these edits. For reference, see eg https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/planning-economic-development/planning/ford-site-21st-century-community/site-demolition

Hi and welcome to OSM! Is there a particular reason you added the landuse=recreation_ground tag to the whole park? It seems redundant at best.

Welcome to OSM! I noticed that in at least some of the places where you added sidewalks, you did not connect them to other features that were already on the map (such as streets or other sidewalks). For things like routing, this is important. On the other hand, it is not important to connect sidewalks to other features like park boundaries. Happy mapping!

Hi, looking at the Amery Golf Club (osm.org/relation/7145495) I think you've misunderstood golf course tagging. Most importantly, you do not need to create that include all features in a golf course--the outline of leisure=golf_course should surround all these features. And even if you did have a relation, you wouldn't want to make the features within "inner" relations, because that means that they are "holes" in the course--that is, places that are NOT part of the golf course (which they all are). One last thing: greens should not be tagged leisure=pitch, this I believe was some "tagging for the renderer". See osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for more info. As that page says, it is helpful to add a way for golf=hole which includes the hole number in the ref tag. This link may help to review your tagging: http://product.itoworld.com/map/47?lon=-92.37148&lat=45.30202&zoom=15&open_sidebar=share_menu (note: may be slow to load) Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for adding to the map in Minnesota. Just an FYI, this area is St. Paul, you might want to double-check your changeset comments in the future to make sure they're accurate! :)

Hi, and welcome to OSM! Happened to notice this edit and have a couple suggestions: 1) this is not the right tag for a business, highway=services is used for rest areas. Maybe shop=car_repair would be better? 2) OSM is generally for what is "on the ground", but there are lifecycle prefixes that can be used for features that are planned/proposed/under construction. See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi, welcome to OSM! I noticed in this changeset you tagged parking lots with highway=service. You should only tag the actual lanes within the lot that way. Also, you tagged some churches with religion=* and denomination=*. Just leave these blank if you don't know. One last thing, landuse is not usually used on buildings. You can find more info about it on the wiki's landuse page: osm.wiki/Landuse Happy mapping!

Hi from looking at the aerial imagery, it doesn't appear there is a pond or park at this location. Do you have an explanation? Thanks

I noticed your very detailed work on the golf course--nice! However, it's tagging for the renderer to use highway=path for the golf=hole way.

1) it looks clearly parceled to me--have you looked at the Bing imagery? 2) I live in this area and know a lot of community gardens, they are run *as described on the allotments page*. Unless you have some local knowledge to the contrary please change the garden's tag back. Thanks.

BTW, parks data is also available from the county government's open data portal here: http://gis-hennepin.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/c76bcca7eb564523b6a1cf2807cbc481_3

Sorry I did not notice the copyright on the city website. However, you're wrong about the garden, see the allotments page on the wiki "Allotment gardens are characterised by a concentration in one place of a few or up to several hundreds of land parcels that are assigned to individuals or families" Maybe it's different in Germany, but in the US that describes community gardens.

Pretty clearly a community garden from the imagery, and here's a reference: https://www.stlouispark.org/bronx-park/bronx-park-neighborhood.html I used the city map for Nelson Park boundaries: https://www.stlouispark.org/webfiles/file/ir/2016/citywidemap-24x24.pdf But yeah looks like it may have changed with construction?

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Remember that OSM is data for everyone's use, so things like the house address or building outline will be more useful than what you've entered.

what about a street address?

Is that a pool? Try leisure=swimming_pool instead :)

I think that's better. I'd just use the "merge" for areas contained by other areas. If there are adjacent areas with the same tag, I think you need to merge them more manually. In case it helps, I did a couple others (the ponds N of 100th and W of 143rd, the island in the N end of the lake). If you view them in iD, you'll see info in the members and/or relations sections.