Hi - thanks for the edits! I'm querying Holland Bloorview having a Stopgap Ramp. As a kids' rehab hospital, it has on-level access. Also, the node you edited is a duplicate of the main hospital (way 115040395), so does it add anything that the main hospital doesn't?

(Was with the Stopgap folks at a Tetra event on the weekend, btw. They do great work!)

It's still operating, and still very much above ground

What was your source, please? If this was an import of the Edmonton data, its licence isn't approved for use in OSM

Please check your validation tools - former node 4472746301 isn't a level crossing but an elevated pedestrian/bike bridge

I don't think these comments belong here

Yeah, trying to remember rationale for a 7 year old changeset was a long shot, I know ... This came from a note on the main OSM list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-June/078203.html) and then some very testy mailings from Jochen in talk-ca in the last couple of weeks.

Hi Mark - intrigued to read your changeset comment, as it seems the islands in Callendar Park Pond *don't* render now if the outer way is tagged natural=water. Interestingly, there's a big push on globally to remove tagging from outer ways along with claims that it's always been wrong to do this ...

Hi - thanks for your contributions to OSM!

Could you perhaps be a little more descriptive in your changeset comments? "added house" doesn't tell us much in a changeset spanning half the world. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidance.

Thanks, Manuela - that way is a drive-through for the Tim Hortons coffee shop. I've revised it: osm.org/way/281848415

The way in question was this one - osm.org/way/274338467 - that you'd extended out to join up with the exit road. It stops at the NW corner, and the Bing imagery is too fuzzy to make this detail out

Hey, you *can't* use the city's open data for turn restrictions. The data licence isn't compatible with OSM.

Please revert these changes and any that used the city's data. We're working closely with the city to get the data usable, but we're not there yet.

can you please give more descriptive changeset comments? This is more than "small updates", it's adding a lot of unnecessary turn restrictions

This line won't open until 2021. Please don't map it as a real thing until it exists

Yes, that looks right, thanks!

The service road may only be one way onto Kennedy Road. Please check your sources

I've added entrances to the station and the station's map is here: http://ttc.ca/Subway/Stations/Kennedy/Accessible_Alternative.jsp

The station has an underground mezzanine that's higher than the tracks but still below ground.

deleted buildings; see way 483739791

So ways 69239205, 69239318, 69239827, 69240067, 69240357, 69240427, 69240867, 69241384, 69241838, 69242241, 69242337, 69242393, 69242701, 69243147, 69243708, 69243752, 69244114, 69244126, 69244232, 69244334, 69271314, 69271320, 69271406, 69271682, 69271783, 69271845, 69272105, 69272461, 69272485, 69272562, 69272567, 69272945, 69272990, 69273079 and 69273160 magically disappeared, then? Were all of the addresses bad?

Rather than deleting these, you should have flagged them for other users to correct. As you're mixing additions and deletions in what should only be an import account, it will mean more work to revert.

Please don't delete existing buildings. So far in this changeset I've seen buildings contributed by @andrewpmk and @jiminie deleted.

As you haven't stopped deleting things or responded to my last changeset comments, I'm taking this to talk-ca. If deletions persist, I'll request a block

Please don't delete addr:interpolation ways - such as osm.org/way/98136341 - as it's not part of the discussed import process

Please don't delete addr:interpolation ways - such as osm.org/way/69019779 - as it's not part of the discussed import process