trigpoint's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
90089358 | almost 5 years ago | > However, if there is a path on the ground
> how can we indicate it is suitable for foot,
In England and Wales we use the designation tag to indicate the legal status of a right of way, i.e. designation=public_footpath/public_bridleway/restricted_byway. You should be able to find this by looking at the signs or from the colour of the waymark arrows. osm.wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom will give you some pointers. HTH Phil |
90089358 | almost 5 years ago | Hi
Also you seem to have not taken on board my comments on how long distance paths are mapped as relations. Cheers Phil |
42200018 | almost 5 years ago | Also what does cyc mean? |
90088310 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, in order for routers to use this road you need the connect it to the track. Cheers Phil |
90088526 | almost 5 years ago | Same as the previous comment, it is already part of The Severn Way relation. Cheers Phil |
90088488 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM names are used for the actual name of an object. In this case the name of this footpath is not Offa's Dyke Path but it is part of the long distance path. Long distance routes are mapped as relations and this path is already part of osm.org/relation/9649 It is also part of The Severn Way osm.org/relation/112738 Cheers Phil |
90047039 | almost 5 years ago | Again the mast and the building are two separate objects. How did you find this as its a bit out of the way? Cheers Phil |
90047199 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, this edit is not quite correct. The mast hould not a building object, the site has a building and a mast. These should be mapped as separate objects. Cheers Phil |
89977347 | almost 5 years ago | Hi
Cheers Phil |
89699285 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Ron
|
89699840 | almost 5 years ago | What do you mean by Postcode Directory? Please remember that postcode are copyright and we have to be squeaky clean about only using opendata sources. We are absolutely not allowed to copy from Royal Mail. Cheers Phil |
89701194 | almost 5 years ago | Please stop duplicating information that is already mapped. The university details are already on the campus object. There is no need to duplicate that information on the building.
Cheers Phil |
89454454 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Mitch
The leisure centre tags were already mapped on the campus object and in this edit you have duplicated them on the building and in so doing have lost the building object. Curious what you were trying to achieve? Cheers Phil |
89666775 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, osm.org/way/838894289 is just a private service road leading to a parking area for the houses. It is certainly not a residential road. Cheers Phil |
45146331 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Mike
It appears to be a valid name based on OS Opendata. Cheers Phil |
89480302 | about 5 years ago | Hi, in cases like this you should split the building into two, or provide two nodes. 58-60 should only be used where it is a single point occupying two addresses. Cheers Phil |
89480418 | about 5 years ago | Please only use the name tag for actual verifiable names, the name tag should not be make detail appear on the map. Cheers Phil |
89318855 | about 5 years ago | Thank you, I had never considered mapping such a thing and spotted a very large changeset area. Cheers Phil |
89318855 | about 5 years ago | Hi
Cheers Phil |
89345828 | about 5 years ago | Please do not let your cat walk on the keyboard when you are writing changeset comments :) |