Hi, you re-added access=permissive to via Rudena. This is not correct. This is part of the ZTL, which limits access to permit holders at certain times. Please do not confound "permissive" with "access requires a permit". More in general: mapping of the ZTL in Padova is broken, and needs fixing.

Thanks for bringing this up. To start with my original 2014 tagging of the two concrete blocks/planters was wrong. The tag should have been applied to a node on the way at the position of the planters with max_width=2.3, and not on two blocks besides the road with width=2.3. It looks as if the the blockage at that position is related to the fact that there a two objects about 2.6 meters apart on both side of the way, each with a width of 2.3 meters. I also not that cars are not routed through that block, but bicycles are. I propose to put to place a single barrier=block with max_width=2.3 on the road way. I suspect this will achieve the intended effect on car and bicycle routing.

Come detto, penso che sia meglio di spezzare la relazione in poligoni più piccoli. Non so a che cosa serve una relazione che contiene un solo mega landuse=residential per la città.

Ciao, it's not a question of rendering, it's a question of data. A large hospital is not a residential land use. Farm land is definitely not residential land. The present rendering approach is a trick by the authors of the renderers to make the map rendering work. My main issue with that specific large landuse=residential polygon is that it is simply to big to handle. If you want to work on it, I would suggest to split it in smaller areas and using mainly major roads and waterways as splits.
I simply don't have the time to do this well. I may also have aggravated the problem by changing some land uses. In particular I recently added a missing bit of the Azienda Ospedaliera (western part) that was missing.
Volker

Regarding "BTW": Thanks - that is a finger trouble error, no new tagging practice. Corrected - will be uploaded when I close my active changeset.

There are no traffic signals on the pedestrian crossing in question, and, anyway, if they were, "direction" in that case is meaningless as you cannot distinguish between traffic signal direction for the cars crossing across the pedestrian crossing the footway, and that of pedestrians crossing the road. I will correct the two crossings in question, as I know them as a frequent user.

I checked the name against signs and the official geo-database of house numbers and names. It should be OK now. The bridge itself is called just "Ponte Ognissanti", The road on the eastern side is "Via Fistomba". The road on the western side is "Via Ponte Ognissanti" up to the roundabout. Further west it is called "Via Ognissanti"

OK. Corrected from road signs and direct local knowledge.

node node/179008735/
What do you intend by "direction=both" on a pedestrian crossing?

What is the ource of the name change of the road Via Ognissanti (way 334655693) ?

Corected (no reply from original author)

Hi,
what's this disconnected highway:
osm.org/way/833020072/history
?
BTW: there was a warning when you closed the changeset (see changeset details)

Hi Leonte.
This changeset contains important errors: 1) none of the roads are residential. They all are part of a big farm.
2) ways 949359183 ... 949359192 are all strictly private and not open to the public.
Please do not use areal imaging alone, if you have no knowledge of the local situation. I am correcting the error in this case, but please be careful with adding things from satellite imagery without having access on imagery that allows you to see gates and vertical street signs.
Best regards
Volker (Padova, Italy)

I frgot t mention that there is a different (and older) tagging scheme for street_side parking that, in my view, is perfectly suitable in the case that triggered my comment: osm.wiki/Key:parking:lane.
Hope this is useful.

Hi, thanks for the fast reaction. My apologies for the spelling mistake. I am referring to version 1 of way 952962559. The wiki page clearly states that the tag parking=street_side "requires
amenity=parking or amenity=motorcycle_parking". That is the error flagged by JOSM. In addition the wiki also states that the tag can only be used on nodes and closed ways.

Hi. You inserted roads with the tag "parking=streetside". JOSM flags a problem as the tagging is not conform to the wiki page "parking=streetside".
Please have a look.

Many walls in this changeset are fences.
Please check also position of these objects. I suggest to use Strava Global Heatmap as reference.

Forgot the important: thanks for picking up the spelling mistake

What is the base of your retagging? I am aware of the approved proposal osm.wiki/Key:cycle_barrier, but that does not mention "chicane" as value. According to the new wiki page this is a "cycle_barrier=double".

La rotatoria Via Puccini non è visibile su Bing Maps