Dear BMM994,

Is there indeed a street called "Ha'Nahash" (the snake) in Nahariyya?

osm.org/way/73173705/history

Dear Marten,

Was there any special reason to split the boundary of the Nahal Dalton Nature Reserve into 2 separate ways?

Usually, boundaries do not need to interact with traisl or roads and they can cross one another even without creating a junction.

Best regards,
Zeev

I've reconsidered comment about restoring the original shape, and I agree with you. The length of the section simplified in this changeset is about 6 meters, and the simplification done in this changeset is appropriate.
Thank you for your feedback,
Zeev

bahnpirat,
In changeset osm.org/changeset/39226685 I've made updates to mapping you did in this changeset.

I would appreciate if you could review the changes, as I'm not familiar with power lines mapping.
Zeev

My intention is only to restore the original shape, at the resolution provided by the authorities.

As for the tagging of the relation, I'm using "type=multipolygon" because as far as I understand, type=boundary is applicable only for boundary=administrative and the relation is boundary=protected_area.

This understanding is based on
osm.wiki/Relation#Types_of_relation saying:
"Relation:boundary to exclusively define administrative boundaries"
and osm.wiki/Relation:boundary saying: "Boundary ways should have boundary=administrative ...".

Zeev

Hi,
This changeset modifies the boundary of a nature reserve - osm.org/relation/4726674

Nature reserves' boundaries are a sensitive issue for hikers, as visitors are required to comply with certain restrictions, and the boundaries are not always clearly marked "on the ground". We therefore want to keep the boundaries according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserve proclamations.

See also my post at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54543

According to Israeli law, there is also no issue with having military areas and bases in nature reserves.

In changeset 39218585 I have restored the original boundaries.

Thanks,
Zeev

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the boundary and for fixing my tagging error.

Nature reserves' boundaries are a sensitive issue for hikers, as visitors are required to comply with certain restrictions, and the boundaries are not always clearly marked "on the ground". We therefore want to keep the boundaries according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserve proclamations.

See also my post at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54543

If you don't mind, I'd like to restore the original boundary shape.

Thanks,
Zeev

Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and we try to keep them according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserves proclamations.

Is the change in the boundary of Caesarea National Park [osm.org/way/395559964] based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

If so, can you please add its ID to the existing list in the ref tag.
If not, would you mind if I revert this change?

Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and we try to keep them according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserves proclamations.

Is the change in the boundary of Har Amiad - “Em HaHita” Nature Reserve [way 358358670](osm.org/way/391782515) based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

If so, can you please add its ID to the existing list in the ref tag.

by the way, there are many military areas in Israeli Nature reserves. A military area does not cancel the designation of an area as a nature reserve.

Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and se try to keep them according to the approved land plans.

Is the change in way 358358670 - the nature reserve boundary around Harashim - based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

If so, can you please add its ID to the existing list in the ref tag.

Thanks for adding green colour to way
146820042 (osm.org/way/146820042)
Are you sure that it should all be green, or just until the junction with Ein Hatzeva field school?

If needed, you can cut a way in two and mark just the part that needs to change.
See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=21178

Hi Denis,

Thanks for updating the OpenStreetMap map.

A viewpoint is used in mapping of a place for tourists and travelers.

It is probably not what you had in mind.

The name of the military base can be added to the area:

osm.org/way/60263456

We also separate the names for different languages to different tags:
- "name" for the local name.
- "name:en" for the English name.
- "name:he" for the Hebrew name.
- "name:ru" for the Russian name.

I don't know if MAPS.ME enables such editing.

Please let me know if you need any help, or would prefer that I fix it.

Thanks!

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap editing!

I understand the supermarket changed name from Mega BaIr to Victory.

In OSM we try to separate names according to the languages.

The "name" tag is used for the local language, "name:en" is for the name in English, and "name:he" is for the name in Hebrew.

You can see at
osm.org/way/92514890
that "name:en" and "name:he" ere not changed, and there is a mix of Hebrew and English in the "name" tag.

Perhaps these are limitations of editing using MAPS.ME.

I'd be happy to help you correcct it, or correcct it myself.

please let me know

Hi,

Thanks for adding these two businesses to OSM.

It would be useful if you a tag, like (shop){osm.wiki/Key:shop} or (office){osm.wiki/Key:office], to indicate the kind of business they do.

Also, the location is not very clear.

"שינוי תודעתי"
is located in a junction, together with the traffic lights.

"The Writing Company" is located outside of the building inits area.

Thanks!

Hi,

Recently, parts of the construction roads were opened for public use.

There are some differences between the original plan and the actual execution.

For example, the west roundabout at the Dvira junction is actually west of its planned location.

Is there a way to update the map according to the updated plan without waiting for GPS traces?

Can you please clarify why the 4 buildings were replaced by multipolygons?

Dear Peda,

In this changeset you have removed the note on the "Jerusalem" name dispute

It looks like you did not notice that the resolution of the dispute was already violated and the node does has the banned "name" tag.

Please also consider restoring the note.

I have added all red segments to a new trail relation - osm.org/relation/6029783 with a "Yarok Balev" operator.
If you are using the save marking as ITC - red stripe between two white stripes, then the relation should also have the "osmc:symbol" tag set to "red:white:red_stripe".
Please let me know if you want me to add it.

It looks like the new way 401628991 is part of the Red ITC trail relation, biut it does not have a colour=red tag. Should it have that tag, or should it be removed from the relation?

Is the red trail between A'aron and HaRofe streets an ITC (Israel Trails Committee) trail or was it created by some other organization?