Dear TWHB,

In this edit you have deleted two important relations: 1948518 and 1948505.

See "Separation Wall" at osm.wiki/Israel#Palestine_Related

Can you clarify if this was done by mistake or what is the justification for their deletion.

Best Regards,
Zeev

Hi,

It seems like the larger part of Nahal Neder National Park was not mapped yet.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1304610/85952903-19008c80-b975-11ea-85a3-dac3be109786.png

Would you care to add it?

Thanks!

Nice catch!
It was originally meant for MTB, then the road type was updated to track.
Fixed.

Thanks! Done.

I left a comment to the original mapper in
osm.org/changeset/81349433

שלום נמרוד וברוך הבא ל
OSM

על פניו נראה שבעריכה זו מיפית מסלול טיול אישי ולא מסלול טיול שנבנה על ידי העירייה, החברה להגנת הטבע, או גוף רשמי כלשהו

אם זה המצב, הרי ש,
OSM
הוא לא המקום למיפוי שכזה

זה מצויין למפות שבילים ודרכים למען כולם אבל זה לא המקום להכניס שמות של מסלולי טיול פרטיים ונקודות ציון שלהם למפה שמשרתת את כל המשתמשים.

אנא הבהר את הכוונה בעריכה זו ואשמח לעזור לך לעשות זאת נכון

בברכה,
זאב

I understand that there is no evidence of a trail created by an official entity, such as the city. I'd be happy to delete the relation for it.
OSM policy does not welcome private mapping.

Hi,

The use of waterway=wadi is no longer recommended:
osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dwadi

Please use water=stream or water=river with intermittent=yes

Thanks,
Zeev

Hi,

In this edit you have added an osmc:symbol" tag to a way. It does not have an itc relation, and its kkl relation does not have an osmc:symbol tag.

Did you intend to put this tag on the kkl relation?

Hello Sanniu,

In this changeset you have added a hiking relation for "מסלול מעגלי האירוס הנצרתי".

Do you know is the operator of this hiking? Could it be a private plan of an new mapper, created in osm.org/changeset/81349433?

Thanks,
Zeev

שלום דב,

תודה על העדכון.

האם הסגירה היתה קבועה או זמנית?
האם ידוע לך אם היא נפתחה?

תודה,
זאב

Hello Sivan00,

In this changeset you have added a tourist information office osm.org/node/5415927785 near the Mazor Mausoleum.
As far as I remember, there is no such office at the place. Perhaps you intended to map a signpost?

Hello Dror,
In this changeset you have tagged way
osm.org/way/286396249
with "bicycle=destination".
This cycleway does not seem to have a specific destination.
Did you mean to tag it with "bicycle=designated"?

Hello Dror,
In this changeset you have tagged way
osm.org/way/99868938
with "bicycle=destination".
This cycleway does not seem to have a specific destination.
Did you mean to tag it with "bicycle=designated"?

Hello Dror,
In this changeset you have tagged way
osm.org/way/31539569
with "bicycle=destination".
This cycleway does not seem to have a specific destination.
Did you mean to tag it with "bicycle=designated"?

Hello Dror,
In this changeset you have tagged way osm.org/way/261829896 with "bicycle=destination".
But this cycleway does not seem to have a specific destination.
Did you mean to tag it with "bicycle=designated"?

Hello Ophirh2,

In this edit the tracktype of osm.org/way/730666408 was changed from grade3 to grade5.

According to the Israel mapping guidelines at osm.wiki/Israel#Ways_Belonging_to_a_Trail
grade5 is the most demanding grade for 4WD vehicles:

> Unpaved road requiring deferential locks and high clearance - "דרך עפר לרכב שטח "נעול

It is very unusual to find such roads in a flatland like the Zvulun valley. tracktype=grade4 is also not common in such areas.

Can you please revisit this classification?

Thanks!

Hello Zero0000,

I understand you are new to OSM.
No boundaries were removed in this changeset.

Please see the OSM wiki regarding the "subarea" tag:

"Optional, disputed and redundant (references to sublevels may also be found with spatial queries, provided that there's no overlap between similar subdivisions). Also referencing other relations makes editing more complicated in some cases."

source: osm.wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members

Best regards,
Zeev

Hello Onceinawhile,

The changes in this edit are unrelated to any political event or view.

As the title says, the "subarea" members of the relations were removed because the use of such members is disputed and redundant.

Best regards,
Zeev

Thanks!