zstadler's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
104251811 | over 4 years ago | Hello Clinton, Thanks for trying to avoid such duplicates in advance. It seems that the search methods you were using are not working as expected. I suggest you try the standard search of openstreetmap.org. It would have found "Maale Adumim" for you: osm.org/search?query=Maale%20Adumim In addition to the node you added in this changeset, the above search results show the residential area, as a place=city, and the larger administrative boundary. Note that a place can be mapped as a node, a way, or a relation. When using Overpass queries to look for OSM places, I suggest using `nwr["place" ...` rather than `node["place" ...` In Israel, the chances of finding a populated place that is not mapped in OSM are very low. If in doubt, please feel free to post in the OSM Israel forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33
Best Regards
|
14972384 | over 4 years ago | אני רק הוספתי את השם בעברית. המיקום המקורי הוא חלק מיבוא בן 13 שנה שאינו מדוייק במיוחד
|
104251811 | over 4 years ago | Dear Clinton, As far as I can tell, the localities you've added, as listed in this link - http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/176z, are all duplicates. Please confirm and fix them. Best Regards,
|
104251811 | over 4 years ago | Hello Please note that Ma'ale Adumim is already well mapped by osm.org/node/282405648 Please avoid adding localities before checking their existence in the map, as was also done in osm.org/changeset/104251735 Also, please review your latest additions of cities in the vicinity, and remove any duplicates you've created. Best Regards,
|
104251735 | over 4 years ago | Please note that Sakhnin was already mapped by osm.org/node/278475752 |
102036426 | over 4 years ago | Done |
100132305 | over 4 years ago | אני מאמין גדול ב
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground אם היה שלט בשטח, ההיתי מוסיף |
100132305 | over 4 years ago | כן. יש שם חניון מוסדר. בעמוד ענן יש לו אפילו שם, אבל בשטח אין זכר ללוח ההנצחה שהיה שם |
88846716 | over 4 years ago | I visited the place and could not find a path at the edge of the area where I was.
|
95371175 | over 4 years ago | I have restored the path after a survey was done by the Yarok Balev NGO confirmed its existance. |
101248036 | over 4 years ago | The road has a dead end, so no change is required if the problem is not getting *through* it. If there is no public access to the road, using a gate for example, then an "access=private" tag can be used if pedestrian access is not allowed, or a "motor_vehicle=private" tag if access is not allowed only for vehicles. A road should be deleted only if it no longer exists. I suggest you revert this change. |
101248036 | over 4 years ago | I meant to write "Hi Gal,"... |
101248036 | over 4 years ago | Hן Gשךת It seems like this driveway exists. See https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=201026.85,644938.16&z=10&b=2 for a detauiled aerial photo and its existance in the goverment's map. Following our discuttion at osm.org/changeset/100693305, I suggest that future removal of paths and roads from OSM will be done only when there are multiple reports or when there is additional evidence. |
101993572 | over 4 years ago | אלו שאלות שאתה צריך להפנות לרט"ג
המיפוי ב
|
101993572 | over 4 years ago | כך גם אני חשבתי, אבל היום ההיתי שם ובדקתי את השילוט בשטח |
101840544 | over 4 years ago | אם נבחר צד בכיכר, או בשדרה, הרי שניווט עם כלי רכב יוכל להתבצע רק בכיוון אחד |
99909766 | over 4 years ago | שלום ניר, תודה על התיקונים והשיפורים שאתה מכניס למפות
הנוהג בישראל הוא להוסיף שמות של סיגנלים לתג
זה מאפשר למפות המיועדות לרוכבים להציג את שמות הסינגלים מבלי שהשמות יציפו מפות שאינן יעודיות לרוכבים. תודה,
|
55139765 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for the clarification!
|
100693305 | over 4 years ago | Hi Gal, One option is to use a "surface=unpaved" tag for unpaved paths and footways. See osm.wiki/Key:surface Moovit can then choose how to handle them in your trip plans |
55139765 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Are you sure about the existance of these tunnels?
I'm only certain that osm.org/way/550720219 does not exist. The road is lower that the old track. If this section existed, it would have been a bridge... |